DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

TX: Sewell Family of Companies discloses breach

Posted on March 23, 2021 by Dissent

Seen on their web site:

The Sewell Family of Companies has concluded an investigation into a data security incident that occurred August 1, 2020, when officials learned of an unauthorized attempt to access its network. At the time, SFC followed its protocol and immediately shut down its network to prevent further harm. SFC launched an investigation, notified the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and engaged computer forensic specialists to assist its internal team on this effort.

Although SFC found no evidence that information stored on its network has been misused, it is possible that the personal information of a portion of its community could have been exposed to individuals not authorized to view it.

This investigation was meticulous and today, March 17th, 2021,  was the soonest SFC was in position to provide the facts and ensure resources were in place to protect members of its community.

The Sewell Family of Companies mailed letters on March 17 to a small number of its customers, employees, and others who may have done business with SFC, and offered these individuals at least 12 months of credit monitoring services.

The vast majority of SFC employees and customers are not impacted, though we appreciate this is of little solace to those who do receive a letter. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

There is no evidence that fraud has occurred as a result of this incident. That said, employees and customers are encouraged to utilize these services to protect against fraudulent use of their personal information and remain vigilant against incidents of identity theft and fraud.
Sewell has established a call center to answer questions for those who receive letters. The number is (833) 416-0855.

Additionally, SFC has implemented a series of containment and remediation measures to address the incident, as well as strategies to defend the security of its network.

We are confident we are stronger and better following this experience.

So what kinds of data were involved? The notice doesn’t seem to explain that. And why couldn’t their investigation and work have been completed much sooner? Were there millions of email accounts to go through? What took so long? Why so long from incident to notification? 

 

No related posts.

Category: Business Sector

Post navigation

← NJ law firm provides notice of breach
Japan Halts Use Of Line App For Government Officials Over Chinese Data Breach →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The data appear fake. (1)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases
  • Multiple lawsuits filed against Doyon Ltd over April 2024 data breach and late notification
  • Chinese hackers suspected in breach of powerful DC law firm
  • Qilin Emerged as The Most Active Group, Exploiting Unpatched Fortinet Vulnerabilities
  • CISA tags Citrix Bleed 2 as exploited, gives agencies a day to patch
  • McDonald’s McHire leak involving ‘123456’ admin password exposes 64 million applicant chat records

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’
  • DeleteMyInfo Wins 2025 Digital Privacy Excellence Award from Internet Safety Council
  • TikTok Loses First Appeal Against £12.7M ICO Fine, Faces Second Investigation by DPC

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.