DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Signify Health notifies covered entities’ patients of possible access to their PHI

Posted on April 9, 2021 by Dissent

Signify Health, LLC is a business associate to entities covered under HIPAA.  On October 12, 2020, they discovered that an employee had published his login credentials to a subscription-based job board. The employee, described as a low-level IT Support Specialist, was seeking a coding specialist to help him write a job-related script. He would later claim that he did not realize he had uploaded his login credentials.

From a notification to New Hampshire by Signify’s external counsel:

Signify did not know, consent to, or condone this action; moreover, the employee violated Signify’s established policy and Code of Conduct. Signify has since terminated this employee.

The good news (if there was good news) is that the employee’s job was to receive, log, triage , and track IT support requests in Jira. His login credentials only gave him access to Jira. The other good news was that Signify learned of the exposed credentials in approximately three hours.

The bad news was that every ticket in the Jira support ticket system had to be manually checked to determine whether it contained any protected health information:

To discover any Protected Data, a user must manually open each ticket to determine whether the ticket contains any attachments. If it does, the user must then click on the attachment to determine whether it contains Protected Data.

Despite Kroll’s efforts, they could neither prove nor rule out unauthorized access to any PHI attached to tickets. Those notified were offered identity monitory and credit restoration services through Kroll.

So for a three-hour window of exposure, I wonder what this now-former employee’s mistake cost Signify in terms of incident response.  As a result of the incident, they have made several changes, including implementing two-factor authentication for all its technology systems.

Note that their report to New Hampshire and to patients was in March, and since we have not seen anything from Signify on HHS’s public breach tool, we may not see this one on that list.


Related:

  • PowerSchool commits to strengthened breach measures following engagement with the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
  • Two more entities have folded after ransomware attacks
  • Microsoft Releases Urgent Patch for SharePoint RCE Flaw Exploited in Ongoing Cyber Attacks
  • Premier Health Partners issues a press release about a breach two years ago. Why was this needed now?
  • Missouri Adopts New Data Breach Notice Law
  • Qantas obtains injunction to prevent hacked data’s release
Category: Breach IncidentsInsiderSubcontractor

Post navigation

← Maze/Egregor ransomware cartel estimated to have made $75 million
Fr: City of Isle-sur-la-Sorgue victim of ransomware; won’t pay €500,000 demand →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Scattered Spider Hijacks VMware ESXi to Deploy Ransomware on Critical U.S. Infrastructure
  • Hacker group “Silent Crow” claims responsibility for cyberattack on Russia’s Aeroflot
  • AIIMS ORBO Portal Vulnerability Exposing Sensitive Organ Donor Data Discovered by Researcher
  • Two Data Breaches in Three Years: McKenzie Health
  • Scattered Spider is running a VMware ESXi hacking spree
  • BreachForums — the one that went offline in April — reappears with a new founder/owner
  • Fans React After NASCAR Confirms Ransomware Breach
  • Allianz Life says ‘majority’ of customers’ personal data stolen in cyberattack (1)
  • Infinite Services notifying employees and patients of limited ransomware attack
  • The safe place for women to talk wasn’t so safe: hackers leak 13,000 user photos and IDs from the Tea app

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Congress tries to outlaw AI that jacks up prices based on what it knows about you
  • Microsoft’s controversial Recall feature is now blocked by Brave and AdGuard
  • Trump Administration Issues AI Action Plan and Series of AI Executive Orders
  • Indonesia asked to reassess data privacy terms in new U.S. trade deal
  • Meta Denies Tracking Menstrual Data in Flo Health Privacy Trial
  • Wikipedia seeks to shield contributors from UK law targeting online anonymity
  • British government reportedlu set to back down on secret iCloud backdoor after US pressure

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.