DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Signify Health notifies covered entities’ patients of possible access to their PHI

Posted on April 9, 2021 by Dissent

Signify Health, LLC is a business associate to entities covered under HIPAA.  On October 12, 2020, they discovered that an employee had published his login credentials to a subscription-based job board. The employee, described as a low-level IT Support Specialist, was seeking a coding specialist to help him write a job-related script. He would later claim that he did not realize he had uploaded his login credentials.

From a notification to New Hampshire by Signify’s external counsel:

Signify did not know, consent to, or condone this action; moreover, the employee violated Signify’s established policy and Code of Conduct. Signify has since terminated this employee.

The good news (if there was good news) is that the employee’s job was to receive, log, triage , and track IT support requests in Jira. His login credentials only gave him access to Jira. The other good news was that Signify learned of the exposed credentials in approximately three hours.

The bad news was that every ticket in the Jira support ticket system had to be manually checked to determine whether it contained any protected health information:

To discover any Protected Data, a user must manually open each ticket to determine whether the ticket contains any attachments. If it does, the user must then click on the attachment to determine whether it contains Protected Data.

Despite Kroll’s efforts, they could neither prove nor rule out unauthorized access to any PHI attached to tickets. Those notified were offered identity monitory and credit restoration services through Kroll.

So for a three-hour window of exposure, I wonder what this now-former employee’s mistake cost Signify in terms of incident response.  As a result of the incident, they have made several changes, including implementing two-factor authentication for all its technology systems.

Note that their report to New Hampshire and to patients was in March, and since we have not seen anything from Signify on HHS’s public breach tool, we may not see this one on that list.


Related:

  • Software companies must be held liable for British economic security, say MPs
  • SEC Voluntarily Dismisses SolarWinds Litigation
  • A Swath of Bank Customer Data Was Hacked. The F.B.I. Is Investigating.
  • Cyberattack disables Onsolve Code Red emergency alert system across St. Louis region (1)
  • Des Moines Man Charged with Computer Fraud
  • CrowdStrike catches insider feeding information to ScatteredLapsus$Hunters
Category: Breach IncidentsInsiderSubcontractor

Post navigation

← Maze/Egregor ransomware cartel estimated to have made $75 million
Fr: City of Isle-sur-la-Sorgue victim of ransomware; won’t pay €500,000 demand →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Teen who allegedly stole millions of personal data records arrested in Spain
  • Akira ransomware: FBI tallies 250 million in payouts
  • IE: HSE confirms second ransomware attack but ‘no evidence’ patient data was stolen
  • Examining impact of federal relief program after major healthcare cyberattack — Research Brief
  • Justice Department Announces Actions to Combat Two Russian State-Sponsored Hacking Groups
  • Should entities be required to disclose the name of a vendor if the breach was at the vendor’s?
  • The Hidden Risks of Information Disclosure: A Costly Lesson from Cornwall
  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition (1)
  • US Posts $10 Million Bounty for Iranian Hackers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • U.S. Plans to Scrutinize Foreign Tourists’ Social Media History
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: EFF Launches Age Verification Hub as Resource Against Misguided Laws
  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.