DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

“We are apolitical” — DarkSide threat actors

Posted on May 10, 2021 by Dissent

By now, probably everyone has heard about the Colonial Pipeline security incident that has been linked to threat actors known as DarkSide.

On April 12, this site published an email chat with DarkSide. If you missed that chat write-up, you can read it here.  On May 8, after the mainstream media reported that the Colonial Pipeline incident had been attributed to DarkSide by those familiar with the matter, I reached out to the threat actors to ask for a comment or response.  As I tweeted and reported, they responded, “Hello, no comments,” but then immediately sent another reply explaining, “At the time of negotiations and in the case of payment, we do not  disclose information about the transaction.”

That was their only acknowledgement by that point that they were involved.

Today, they have issued a statement on their leak site:

DarkSide Press Message

About the latest news.

10.05.2021

We are apolitical, we do not participate in geopolitics, do not need to tie us with a defined goverment and look for other our motives.

Our goal is to make money, and not creating problems for society.
From today we introduce moderation and check each company that our partners want to encrypt to avoid social consequences in the future.

That press statement is consistent with what they had stated in our email interview when I asked them if they ever had regretted any attack. They responded how they added funeral homes and crematoria to their exclusion list because they had regretted what a partner had done. Now they say they will start moderation to check companies that their partners want to encrypt.

Chalk this up as purely opinion, but I think it’s likely that they are quite serious about that. Since Colonial Pipeline is private industry and not a state/government entity, they probably did not consider it as infrastructure or political as much as just a typical big (lucrative) target by a partner.

Could DarkSide be state-related? Could they have lied about that? Sure. But then do we say the same thing about every threat actor group that may speak Russian? Is there any evidence that DarkSide has had any political or governmental targets?

Category: Business SectorCommentaries and AnalysesMalwareOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Tulsa, Oklahoma and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute disclose ransomware incidents
No: Volue ASA hit by Ryuk ransomware →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Oklahoma Expands its Security Breach Notification Law
  • Ransomware group Gunra claims to have exfiltrated 450 million patient records from American Hospital Dubai.
  • North Shore University Sleep Disorders Center employee charged with secretly recording patients in restrooms
  • When ransomware listings create confusion as to who the victim was
  • Rajkot civic body’s GIS website hit by cyber attack, over 400 GB data feared stolen
  • Taiwan’s BitoPro hit by NT$345 million cryptocurrency hack
  • Texas gastroenterology and surgical practice victim of ransomware attack
  • Romanian Citizen Pleads Guilty to ‘Swatting’ Numerous Members of Congress, Churches, and Former U.S. President
  • North Dakota Enacts Financial Data Security and Data Breach Notification Requirements
  • Pro-Ukraine hacker group Black Owl poses ‘major threat’ to Russia, Kaspersky says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Florida ban on kids using social media likely unconstitutional, judge rules
  • State Data Minimization Laws Spark Compliance Uncertainty
  • Supreme Court Agrees to Clarify Emergency Situations Where Police Don’t Need Warrant
  • Stewart Baker vs. Orin Kerr on “The Digital Fourth Amendment”
  • Fears Grow Over ICE’s Reach Into Schools
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.