DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Audit of the Department of Defense’s Controls on Health Information of Well-Known Department of Defense Personnel (DODIG-2021-106)

Posted on September 2, 2021 by Dissent

Summary from the OIG:

Objective

The objective of this audit was to determine whether the DoD effectively controlled access to health information of well-known DoD personnel.

 

Background

The DoD maintains millions of electronic health records on its DoD beneficiaries, [REDACTED] DoD personnel who are granted access to health information to perform their official duties may access, without an official reason, a patient’s protected health information, such as medical diagnoses, mental health notes, medications, and personally identifiable information, such as a social security number. [REDACTED] which violates the personal privacy of the affected individuals.

According to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and DoD guidance, all authorized users of health information must access only data that they are authorized to access, must have a need to know, and must assume only authorized roles and privileges.

We nonstatistically selected 38 well‑known individuals to determine whether their health information was accessed by an unauthorized health care official. We limited the review to individuals that became well‑known from a high‑media incident [REDACTED]. A high-media incident is when a large audience learns of an event through media communications, such as social media, broadcasting, or newspapers. We requested electronic health records access logs from the Defense Health Agency (DHA) in April 2020 for the selected DoD personnel. A total of 1,410 individuals accessed the health information of these 38 individuals. We nonstatistically selected 44 DoD personnel (viewers) that accessed the health information for 18 of the 38 well‑known individuals based on risk factors, such as a difference in locations of the viewers and the well‑known individuals, and information accessed immediately after high-media incidents. Afterward, we requested the applicable Military Department or the DHA provide a reason for why the selected viewers accessed the health information of the well‑known individual.

 

Finding

The DoD did not effectively control access to health information of well‑known DoD personnel and possibly of any DoD personnel, as exemplified by what we found regarding well‑known DoD personnel. Specifically:

  • 7 viewers were confirmed by the applicable DoD Components as authorized to access the health information;
  • 15 viewers were confirmed by the applicable DoD Components as unauthorized to access health information; these individuals violated HIPAA and DoD guidance; and
  • 22 viewers were not confirmed by the applicable DoD Components as authorized or unauthorized to access the health information of DoD well‑known personnel; however, the access was likely unauthorized.

 

Recommendations

We recommend that the DHA Director, in coordination with the Military Department Surgeons General:

  • perform a review of unauthorized and undetermined access of protected health information of all personnel identified in this audit, (2) based on the results, initiate appropriate disciplinary actions for individuals that were not authorized to access the information of all personnel, and (3) report the incidents in accordance with applicable laws and DoD guidance.

 

Management Comments and Our Response

The DHA Director partially agreed with the recommendation [REDACTED].

Although the DHA Director partially agreed, the comments provided addressed the specifics of the recommendation; therefore, the recommendation is resolved but will remain open. We will close the recommendation once we obtain documentation that shows the DHA [REDACTED]

The DHA Director agreed with the recommendation regarding the review of unauthorized and undetermined access and resulting disciplinary actions, and reporting of incidents. The DHA Director stated that the DHA is in the process of reviewing what we presented as unauthorized and undetermined access of protected health information of all personnel identified in this audit, and anticipates completion of the review this year. In addition, the Director stated that incidents found to be in violation of unauthorized access or disclosure, will be dealt with in accordance with applicable laws and DoD guidance.

Comments from the Director addressed the specifics of the recommendation; therefore, the recommendation is resolved but will remain open. We will close the recommendation once we obtain the results of the review, and verify the actions that the DHA Director takes fully address the recommendation.

Access the full Report No. DODIG-2021-106  (pdf, 28 pp)

Related posts:

  • HIPAA Security Rule Facility Access Controls – What are they and how do you implement them?
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesGovernment SectorHealth DataOf Note

Post navigation

← Nigerian hacker and a repeat offender sentenced to federal prison for unemployment fraud and tax fraud scheme
US farm loses $9 million in the aftermath of a ransomware attack →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Mississippi Law Firm Sues Cyber Insurer Over Coverage for Scam
  • Ukrainian Hackers Wipe 47TB of Data from Top Russian Military Drone Supplier
  • Computer Whiz Gets Suspended Sentence over 2019 Revenue Agency Data Breach
  • Ministry of Defence data breach timeline
  • Hackers Can Remotely Trigger the Brakes on American Trains and the Problem Has Been Ignored for Years
  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The patient data appears fake. (2)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The EU’s Plan To Ban Private Messaging Could Have a Global Impact (Plus: What To Do About It)
  • A Balancing Act: Privacy Issues And Responding to A Federal Subpoena Investigating Transgender Care
  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.