DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Two covered entities who discovered breaches last summer first notifying patients

Posted on January 21, 2022 by Dissent

Two breaches that were first reported to HHS in November have now been more fully disclosed. Both of the following breaches were first reported to HHS in November as impacting 500 or 501 patients — entries that this site usually suspects are just “markers” for “we have no idea yet how many were impacted.”

Anne Arundel Medical Center (Maryland, phishing attack)

Zeke Hartner reports:

Luminis Health, the owners of Anne Arundel Medical Center in Maryland, announced Thursday that its email system was accessed by an unauthorized party, and some patient information could have been exposed during the breach.

The health company said it became aware of the breach within its employee email system on Sept. 3, 2021, and took steps to secure the impacted email accounts.

They then hired a computer forensics firm to assist in an investigation into the incident. That investigation found that an unauthorized person accessed employee email accounts between Aug. 26 and Sept. 14.

Read more at WTOP.

Marietta Area Health Care dba Memorial Health System (Ohio, ransomware)

Evan Bevins reports:

Personal information for more than 200,000 people may have been accessible during a cyber attack on Memorial Health System last year, although officials say there is no indication any identity theft or unauthorized use of the data occurred.

Patients from Memorial whose personal health information, Social Security number, account number or date of birth could have been accessed recently received letters notifying them of the situation. The letter says the recipient’s information was present in systems that were accessed by an “unauthorized actor” around July 10 through Aug. 15.

Read more at News & Sentinel.

Not everyone impacted by the Anne Arundel incident has been sent letters yet — and may not get them for weeks — even though the breach was first discovered on September 3.

The Memorial Health breach was first detected in August. The system gives a chronology of its discovery and investigation, but the bottom line is that neither of these entities notified affected patients “no later than 60 calendar days” from when the breaches were discovered.

What is HHS going to do about this repeated problem of notifications taking many months following initial discovery of a breach?  Anne Arundel discovered a problem on September 3. They appear to have stopped the access by September 14. Four months later, some patients still haven’t been notified.

At some point, we should see an update on the number of patients impacted by the Anne Arundel incident. The Memorial Health incident impacted 216,478 patients.


Related:

  • Russian hackers target IVF clinics across UK used by thousands of couples
  • US, allies sanction Russian bulletproof hosting services for ransomware support
  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches
  • Princeton University Data Breach Impacts Alumni, Students, Employees
  • From bad to worse: Doctor Alliance hacked again by same threat actor (2)
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
Category: Health DataMalwarePhishingU.S.

Post navigation

← CA: Chico State computer hacker sentenced
IRS Will Soon Require Selfies for Online Access →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition (1)
  • US Posts $10 Million Bounty for Iranian Hackers
  • South Korea police raid e-commerce giant Coupang over data leak; govt schedules hearing
  • FinCEN Report: Reported Ransomware Incidents and Payments Reached All-Time High in 2023
  • Leavenworth, Kansas cyberattack disrupts city services
  • They’ve escaped a lot of media attention, but Anubis RaaS is a threat to the medical sector (1)
  • “In the most expedient time possible…”
  • Portugal updates cybercrime law to exempt security researchers
  • LockBit 5’s “new secure blog domain” infra leaked already

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.