DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

CareSouth Carolina hit with proposed class action lawsuit

Posted on February 2, 2022 by Dissent

ClassActions.org reports that CareSouth Carolina has been hit with a potential class action lawsuit. The caption is Mixon v. CareSouth Carolina, Inc. § 4:22-CV-00269

You can access a copy of the complaint at https://www.classaction.org/media/mixon-v-caresouth-carolina-inc.pdf

The lawsuit stems from what the complaint describes as an attack against CareSouth in 2020 that was first reported to affected individuals in May, 2021.

As DataBreaches.net had found at the time, the breach was reported in May, 2021 to HHS as affecting 76,035 members. Digging into the matter revealed that CareSouth Carolina was just one of Netgain Technology’s clients who had been impacted by a ransomware attack on the IT company in 2020. In its notification to patients, CareSouth claimed that it did not obtain information from Netgain as to who was impacted until April 13, 2021:

On December 1, 2020, Netgain informed CareSouth Carolina that it was investigating an IT security incident. At that time, CareSouth Carolina had no reason to believe that patient information was involved. On January 14, 2021, Netgain informed CareSouth Carolina that its investigation found that some of servers that it maintained for CareSouth Carolina were affected as part of a ransomware attack on December 3, 2020. On April 13, 2021, CareSouth Carolina received a copy of the records that Netgain believed were affected by the attack. On April 27, 2021, CareSouth Carolina completed its review of the records and determined that your information was involved.

As noted in the lawsuit complaint, Netgain paid the unnamed attackers ransom to secure a promise that all data would be deleted, but such promises cannot really be relied upon.

The plaintiff, a Darlington County, South Carolina resident, claims her information was used by “nefarious actors” to open accounts in her name, which thus damaged her reputation and creditworthiness.

“None of the above responses by Defendant or NetGain are adequate to make the Plaintiff whole,” the suit reads.

Can CareSouth be successfully sued for a data security breach at their business associate?   Netgain is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit.

Can the named plaintiff even demonstrate that the identity theft or financial harm she suffered stemmed from this incident and not some other incident? Surely if the threat actors were misusing data from more than 76,000 patients, there would be others all reporting problems at around the same time, no?  And would there be any other clients of Netgain whose patients became victims of fraud or misuse of their data?

When there are so many breaches everywhere, how do you prove that one specific breach was the source of misused data if there are no tagged or mistyped records that can be definitively linked to only that source?

 

Related posts:

  • Proposed class action settlement in In re Netgain Technology litigation
  • Kept in the Dark — Meet the Hired Guns Who Make Sure School Cyberattacks Stay Hidden
Category: Breach IncidentsMalwareSubcontractor

Post navigation

← Your morning reminder that health data breaches are … everywhere (updated)
1 in 7 Ransomware Extortion Attacks Leak Critical Operational Technology Info — Mandiant →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Chinese hackers suspected in breach of powerful DC law firm
  • Qilin Emerged as The Most Active Group, Exploiting Unpatched Fortinet Vulnerabilities
  • CISA tags Citrix Bleed 2 as exploited, gives agencies a day to patch
  • McDonald’s McHire leak involving ‘123456’ admin password exposes 64 million applicant chat records
  • Qilin claims attack on Accu Reference Medical Laboratory. It wasn’t the lab’s first data breach.
  • Louis Vuitton hit by data breach in Türkiye, over 140,000 users exposed; UK customers also affected (1)
  • Infosys McCamish Systems Enters Consent Order with Vermont DFR Over Cyber Incident
  • Obligations under Canada’s data breach notification law
  • German court offers EUR 5000 compensation for data breaches caused by Meta
  • Air Force Employee Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy to Disclose Unlawfully Classified National Defense Information

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • DeleteMyInfo Wins 2025 Digital Privacy Excellence Award from Internet Safety Council
  • TikTok Loses First Appeal Against £12.7M ICO Fine, Faces Second Investigation by DPC
  • German court offers EUR 5000 compensation for data breaches caused by Meta
  • How to Build on Washington’s “My Health, My Data” Act
  • Department of Justice Subpoenas Doctors and Clinics Involved in Performing Transgender Medical Procedures on Children
  • Google Settles Privacy Class Action Over Period Tracking App
  • ICE Is Searching a Massive Insurance and Medical Bill Database to Find Deportation Targets

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.