DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Are victims of Netgain ransomware incident first being notified now?

Posted on June 1, 2022 by Dissent

Accounting firm Perkins & Co. in Portland Oregon has submitted a notification to the Vermont Attorney General’s Office about a breach that goes back to 2020 — the Netgain ransomware incident that impacted numerous clients and individuals.

According to Perkins’ notification, Netgain first notified them of the breach in December 2020. So why did it take until May 2022 for Perkins to determine who they needed to notify?  Did they have an unusually high number of people impacted? Why does their notification appear to be so much later than others?

It turns out that this is not Perkins & Co.’s first notification about this breach.  Counsel for Perkins  & Co. filed notifications to the Maine Attorney General’s Office in March 2021 on behalf of Wieden+Kennedy (2,642 affected), in April 2021 on behalf of Barrett Business Services, Inc. (23,018 affected) and  on behalf of eight other clients (53,768 affected), and on May 4, 2021 on behalf of M. Financial Holdings Incorporated (12,379 affected).  In May 2021, a notification to the New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office also noted two other clients who were affected, although no numbers were disclosed.

Whether the May 27, 2022 notice to Vermont indicates that there are yet others first being notified is unknown to DataBreaches.

You can read their full May 27 notification letter at the Vermont Attorney General’s website.

 

Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← Workers overpaid during cyberattack told they have to pay employers back
FBI thwarts cyberthreat against Boston Children’s Hospital by hackers sponsored by Iranian government →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Former Hilliard treatment center employee accused of selling patient data on dark web
  • Trump Rewrites Cybersecurity Policy in Executive Order
  • AMI Group – Travel & Tours notice of ransomware attack
  • Resource: Insider Threat reports
  • Za: Cyber extortionist sentenced to eight years in jail
  • ICE takes steps to deport the Australian hacker known as “DR32”
  • Hearing on the Federal Government and AI
  • Nigerian National Sentenced To More Than Five Years For Hacking, Fraud, And Identity Theft Scheme
  • Data breach of patient info ends in firing of Miami hospital employee
  • Texas DOT investigates breach of crash report records, sends notification letters

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Privacy Victory! Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in OPM/DOGE Lawsuit
  • The Decision That Murdered Privacy
  • Hearing on the Federal Government and AI
  • California county accused of using drones to spy on residents
  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.