DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

DOCS Medical Group discloses September ransomware incident

Posted on November 22, 2022 by Dissent

DOCS Medical Group is an urgent care and primary care provider in Connecticut with multiple locations. They also provide telemedicine services.

On September 7, DOCS detected abnormal activity that was quickly identified as a ransomware attack.

According to their notification letter to patients dated November 7, an unspecified number of patients had their information on a server that had been targeted. The information included demographic information (e.g. name and contact information), medical history, reasons for visiting DOCS Medical Group, Social Security number, insurance information, and various types of financial information. DOCS accepts health insurance and also has its own UR Health plan that patients can subscribe to.

The ransomware attack reportedly did not affect electronic medical records or billing systems, and DOCS Medical Group was “fully operational at all times.”

The notification does not indicate what ransomware group hit the practice, whether files were locked, and if they were locked, whether DOCS was able to decrypt them or restore them from backup. Nor does the notification indicate whether any ransom demand was received and if it was, whether DOCS engaged with the threat actors at all or paid them.

But perhaps one of the most intriguing statements in the notification was this: “The ransomware attack did not occur due to any act or omission of DOCS or its staff.”

So then how did the threat actors gain access?

Later in the notice, they state: “DOCS takes its obligation to protect the privacy and  confidentiality of our patients’ personal information and we expect our vendors to do the same.” Why were vendors mentioned here? Was this breach related to a vendor in any way? Is that why they said the attack did not occur due to any act or omission of DOCS or its staff?

DataBreaches sent an email to DOCS Medical Group yesterday asking for more details about the ransomware attack and for an explanation of certain statements in their notification.  No reply has been received as yet, and the incident does not yet appear on HHS’s public breach tool.  This post will be updated when more information becomes available.


Related:

  • Two suspected Scattered Spider hackers plead not guilty over Transport for London cyberattack
  • Attleboro investigating ‘cybersecurity incident' impacting city's IT systems
  • Russian hackers target IVF clinics across UK used by thousands of couples
  • US, allies sanction Russian bulletproof hosting services for ransomware support
  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches
  • Princeton University Data Breach Impacts Alumni, Students, Employees
Category: Breach IncidentsHealth DataMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← The LinkedIn-HiQ Labs Case and Data Scraping in the US: Some Takeaways
Doctors Center Hospital reports 1.2 million patients affected by ransomware attack →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Two suspected Scattered Spider hackers plead not guilty over Transport for London cyberattack
  • Attleboro investigating ‘cybersecurity incident’ impacting city’s IT systems
  • Fired techie admits sabotaging ex-employer, causing $862K in damage
  • Threat actors have reportedly launched yet another campaign involving an application connected to Salesforce
  • Russian hackers target IVF clinics across UK used by thousands of couples
  • US, allies sanction Russian bulletproof hosting services for ransomware support
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches
  • Report released on PowerSchool cyber attack
  • Sue The Hackers – Google Sues Over Phishing as a Service

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Cole v. Quest Diagnostics: The Third Circuit Weighs in on Pixels, Privacy, and Medical Data
  • Closing the Privacy Gap: HIPRA Targets Health Apps and Wearables
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data
  • India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.