DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

New Jersey law enforcement officers sue 118 data brokers for not removing personal info

Posted on February 14, 2024 by Dissent

Suzanne Smalley reports:

Over the course of the last week, 118 class action lawsuits were filed against data brokers who allegedly failed to respond to requests from about 20,000 New Jersey law enforcement personnel asking to remove their personal information from the internet.

New Jersey law prohibits the disclosure of home addresses and unpublished telephone numbers for current and retired police officers, prosecutors, and judges, along with their family members. If that information is disclosed, the law requires it be removed within 10 days of a takedown request.

Failure to do so could result in a $1,000 fine per violation.

Read more at The Record.


Related:

  • Congress finds data brokers cost consumers tens of billions of dollars
  • Two men accused of harassing NJ police officers by posting hacked personal info online
  • New Jersey Psychology Practice Revealed Patients’ Mental Disorders in Debt Lawsuits
  • Lawmakers introduce bipartisan bill for 'internet of things' security standards
  • TX: Statement and Frequently Asked Questions about the 2018 ERS OnLine Security Incident
Category: ExposureGovernment SectorLegislationState/LocalU.S.

Post navigation

← US military notifies 20,000 of data breach after cloud email leak
Insurance provider for public servants abroad detects ‘cybersecurity incident’ →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Telus Digital confirms breach after ShinyHunters claims 1 petabyte data theft
  • China’s CERT warns OpenClaw can inflict nasty wounds
  • Bell Ambulance data breach impacted over 238,000 people
  • Lotte Card fined 9.6 billion won for leaking users’ social registration numbers
  • Handala claims responsibility for attack on medical device maker Stryker
  • Police Scotland fined £66k for extracting and sharing mobile phone data
  • The rise of teen hackers ‘makes for a good headline’, but cyber crime activities peak later in life
  • Viral ‘Quittr’ Porn Addiction App Exposed the Masturbation Habits of Hundreds of Thousands of Users
  • New Report Finds One in Two U.S. School Districts Experienced a Cybersecurity Incident in 2025
  • Foreign hacker in 2023 compromised Epstein files held by FBI, source and documents show

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Petition filed over misuse of protesters’ data by Kenyan government and telcos
  • When Miscarriage Is Recast As Murder
  • The Government Uses Targeted Advertising to Track Your Location. Here’s What We Need to Do.
  • Santa Ana homeowner says insurance company used drone to inspect her roof without telling her
  • Ring’s Jamie Siminoff is still trying to calm privacy fears, but his answers may not help

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: Dissent.73

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.