DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

70,000 Adventist Health Tulare patients being notified of HIPAA breach by payment collections associate

Posted on June 9, 2024 by Dissent

Adventist Health Tulare has issued a press release about a breach at a business associate in Nebraska.

The June 7 press release states, “A data security incident was recently discovered by Signature Performance, an agency working on behalf of Adventist Health Tulare to collect payment for services.”

Their investigation determined that an unknown party accessed certain files on Signature Performance’s network. “Signature Performance discovered that more than 70,000 patients were affected by this breach. Every case is different for each patient, and each patient will receive a letter from Signature Performance regarding what information is impacted,” they write.

A copy of the full statement can be found on Adventist Health’s website. It is not linked from Adventist Health’s homepage or from Adventist Health Tulare’s home page, and it is not linked from their News section. Given that patients may not recognize the name Signature Performance as a return address on postal mail, Adventist should have a prominently linked notice on its website to make patients aware they may be receiving mail from Signature Performance.

What we don’t know so far

A careful reading of the press release suggests at least two gaps in our understanding of this incident, apart from obvious questions such as how the attacker gained access.

When did Signature Performance first discover the breach of their system?

Adventist Health says that Signature Performance “recently discovered….” What do they mean by “recently?”  DataBreaches notes that in February of this year, Signature Performance notified the Maine Attorney General’s Office of a breach that reportedly affected 7,122 people. That breach occurred between January 17 and January 18 and was discovered on January 18, 2024.

Is this the same incident that Adventist Health Tulare is now reporting as recently discovered, or is this a second or new incident at Signature Performance? DataBreaches submitted a contact form inquiry to Signature Performance today to ask if the incident reported by Adventist Health Tulare is the same incident they reported to Maine in February. No reply has been received as yet.

When did Signature Performance first notify Adventist Health of the breach?

Adventist’s press release does not disclose when Signature Performance first notified them of the breach. Signature Performance is sending out the individual notification letters, but when was Adventist first notified? Have they known about this since January or February, or is this really a new incident and they were only very recently notified?

No related posts.

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHackHealth DataSubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← Christie’s discloses cyberattack in May
RansomHouse: investigation and findings by Analyst1 →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Mississippi Law Firm Sues Cyber Insurer Over Coverage for Scam
  • Ukrainian Hackers Wipe 47TB of Data from Top Russian Military Drone Supplier
  • Computer Whiz Gets Suspended Sentence over 2019 Revenue Agency Data Breach
  • Ministry of Defence data breach timeline
  • Hackers Can Remotely Trigger the Brakes on American Trains and the Problem Has Been Ignored for Years
  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The patient data appears fake. (2)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The EU’s Plan To Ban Private Messaging Could Have a Global Impact (Plus: What To Do About It)
  • A Balancing Act: Privacy Issues And Responding to A Federal Subpoena Investigating Transgender Care
  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.