DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

2nd Settlement Triggered by 2017 Ransomware Attack Costs WA Practice $100K; ‘Not a Breach’

Posted on October 21, 2024October 21, 2024 by Dissent

DataBreaches recently posted a press release from HHS OCR that announced a settlement with Cascade Eye and Skin Centers following a ransomware investigation. Theresa Defino of Report on Patient Privacy (RPP) dug into the incident and investigation more, and her reporting services as a great reminder that HHS’s press releases frequently do not really answer the kinds of questions we have about an incident or HHS’s enforcement actions and reasons. Her piece begins:

Let’s review for a moment.

It’s not a HIPAA violation to be a victim of ransomware.

It’s not a HIPAA violation to pay a ransom.

It’s up to the covered entity (CE) to determine if a security or privacy incident is a breach reportable to the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR), patients, the media and state regulators (though, of course, authorities could disagree later).

Yet, on June 17, Amber Gilroy, CEO of Cascade Eye and Skin Centers P.C. of Washington state, signed a settlement agreement with OCR that included a $250,000 payment and an extensive two-year corrective action plan (CAP).[1] OCR didn’t announce the settlement until three months later, and then, as it has with the previous three similar settlements, linked it to the growing incidence of ransomware afflicting health care organizations.

[…]

OCR’s investigation “found multiple potential violations of the HIPAA Security Rule, including failures by Cascade Eye and Skin Centers to conduct a compliant risk analysis to determine the potential risks and vulnerabilities to ePHI in its systems, and to have sufficient monitoring of its health information systems’ activity to protect against a cyber-attack,” it said. However, the settlement agreement itself enumerates just two: risk analysis and regular review of system activity.

Gilroy and Christiansen told RPP they “wanted to reiterate” that the $250,000 is “not based on any finding of a breach, despite the OCR press release implications.” Whether a breach occurred “wasn’t cited or discussed as a possible violation or the basis for the amount of the payment,” they said. As with most settlements, Cascade did not admit to wrongdoing.

Gilroy, who joined Cascade in May 2021, and Christiansen answered all of RPP’s questions except one: the amount of the ransomware.

Read what Defino learned on JDSupra.

Related posts:

  • HHS Office for Civil Rights Settles Ransomware Cybersecurity Investigation for $250,000
  • HIPAA Security Rule Facility Access Controls – What are they and how do you implement them?
  • HHS Office for Civil Rights Imposes a $240,000 Civil Monetary Penalty Against Providence Medical Institute in HIPAA Ransomware Cybersecurity Investigation
  • HHS Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Ransomware Cybersecurity Investigation for $90,000
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHealth DataHIPAAOf Note

Post navigation

← Dutch police post warning message in Telegram groups after four data broker arrests
Rocky Mountain Gastroenterology appears to have been attacked by three different groups; more than 169,000 patients affected (1) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Air Force Employee Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy to Disclose Unlawfully Classified National Defense Information
  • UK police arrest four in connection with M&S, Co-op and Harrods cyberattacks (1)
  • At U.S. request, France jails Russian basketball player Daniil Kasatkin on suspicion of ransomware conspiracy
  • Avantic Medical Lab hacked; patient data leaked by Everest Group
  • Integrated Oncology Network victim of phishing attack; multiple locations affected (2)
  • HHS’ Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Privacy and Security Rule Investigation with Deer Oaks Behavioral Health for $225k and a Corrective Action Plan
  • HB1127 Explained: North Dakota’s New InfoSec Requirements for Financial Corporations
  • Credit reports among personal data of 190,000 breached, put for sale on Dark Web; IT vendor fined
  • Five youths arrested on suspicion of phishing
  • Russia Jailed Hacker Who Worked for Ukrainian Intelligence to Launch Cyberattacks on Critical Infrastructure

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • How to Build on Washington’s “My Health, My Data” Act
  • Department of Justice Subpoenas Doctors and Clinics Involved in Performing Transgender Medical Procedures on Children
  • Google Settles Privacy Class Action Over Period Tracking App
  • ICE Is Searching a Massive Insurance and Medical Bill Database to Find Deportation Targets
  • Franklin, Tennessee Resident Sentenced to 30 Months in Federal Prison on Multiple Cyber Stalking Charges
  • On July 7, Gemini AI will access your WhatsApp and more. Learn how to disable it on Android.
  • German court awards Facebook user €5,000 for data protection violations

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.