DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Rocky Mountain Gastroenterology appears to have been attacked by three different groups; more than 169,000 patients affected (1)

Posted on October 21, 2024November 29, 2024 by Dissent

Update: On November 13, Rocky Mountain Gastroenterology (RMG) reported the incident to HHS OCR as affecting 366,491 patients. RMG never responded to the inquiries this site submitted to it on October 19 and October 27.

SuspectFile reports:

This article will cover what appears to be a triple cyberattack on the IT systems of Rocky Mountain Gastroenterology (RMG), a medical clinic specializing in gastroenterology with its main office in Lakewood, Colorado, and 26 operational locations. According to information gathered in recent weeks, the attack was carried out by three different cybercriminal groups.

Initial findings suggested that RMG had been targeted by only two groups, Meow Leaks and RansomHub. However, a third group was later identified thanks to a tip from Dissent at DataBreaches.net: the Trinity ransomware group.

As reported on the respective blogs of these three groups in recent days, the total amount of exfiltrated data is not uniform and varies by group:

  • Trinity: 330 GB
  • RansomHub: 200 GB
  • Meow Leaks: over 80 GB

Currently, the Trinity blog no longer lists any of its victims, but we have confirmed two records through ransomfeed.it and ransomlook.io.

Read more at SuspectFile, who saved us all a lot of time and effort by going through the data leaks and writing up details of what he found.

As of today, there is still no substitute notice or statement on the covered entity’s website about any breach, much less multiple breaches. Nor is there any entry on HHS’s public breach tool, although they do not always post notices as soon as they get them.  Although SuspectFile was able to report that protected health information for 169,000 patients was found, because there was no available tranche from Trinity to examine, we do not know the actual total number of unique patients represented in all three incidents.

This situation seems to call for a thorough investigation that considers, in part, how was access gained in each case — were all threat actors using the same access?  Once they first detected access or abnormal activity, what did RMG do to prevent or block further access?  Trinity was the first to publicly list or claim responsibility for an attack on RMG, followed by RansomHub and then Meow Leaks, but is that the actual sequence in which access was gained?

DataBreaches had emailed an inquiry to RMG on October 19 seeking additional details, but no reply has been received as of publication.

Category: Health DataMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← 2nd Settlement Triggered by 2017 Ransomware Attack Costs WA Practice $100K; ‘Not a Breach’
Justice Department Issues Comprehensive Proposed Rule Addressing National Security Risks Posed to U.S. Sensitive Data →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Why Dumping Sensitive Data on Network Shares is a Liability
  • A militarily degraded Iran may turn to asymmetrical warfare – raising risk of proxy and cyber attacks
  • Pro-Russian hackers disrupt Dutch government websites ahead of NATO summit
  • Iran-Linked Threat Actors Leak Visitors and Athletes’ Data from Saudi Games
  • UK: Oxford City Council still investigating cyberattack from earlier this month
  • Steelmaker Nucor Says Hackers Stole Data in Recent Attack
  • People’s Republic of China cyber threat activity: Cyber Threat Bulletin
  • Ukrainian Web3 security auditing company Hacken suffered an attack that allowed a hacker to create 900 million HAI tokens
  • McLaren provides written notice to 743,131 patients after ransomware attack in July 2024 (2)
  • A state forensics lab was leaking its files. Getting it locked down involved a number of people.

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Sky Views Personal Data as a Potential Weapon in IPTV Piracy War
  • Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests
  • Federal Court Strikes Down HIPAA Reproductive Health Care Privacy Rule
  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.