DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Almost one month after Brain Cipher claimed to have attacked them, Pulmonary Physicians of South Florida has yet to publicly confirm or deny any breach

Posted on March 17, 2025March 17, 2025 by Dissent

Pulmonary Physicians of South Florida (PPSF) describe themselves as a group of experienced and highly qualified pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine physicians. “We provide comprehensive, state of the art diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the lungs in every hospital in Miami-Dade County, as well as in select hospitals in Broward and Monroe counties,” they claim, suggesting that they have a large practice and may have a great deal of protected health information on their system.

On February 19, the ransomware group known as Brain Cipher added the provider to their dark web leak site with proof of claims.  The proof consisted of screenshots of a medication request for a named patient and a partial listing of folders on a drive, where the folder names appeared to be patient last name and first name with the patient’s date of birth as part of the folder name (e.g., lname fname MM-DD-YYYY). The screenshot also displayed folder names for internal files.

Part of the proof of claims posted on Brain Cipher’s dark web leak site revealed a medication request for a named patient and a directory of folders where folder names appeared to be structured with the patient last and first names with date of birth. Screenshot redacted by DataBreaches.net

Brain Cipher’s listing does not indicate when they first attacked PPSF  or how many files or GB or TB of data were acquired, but the other part of their proof of claims consisted of a file tree that lists 423,920 files.  The file names generally consist of the patient’s name with a date of service, and some indication of the contents of the file or record (e.g., whether it was a scan or a progress note, etc.).  Because there were often multiple files for each named patient, the 423, 920 does not represent the number of unique patients but may possibly represent the number of records acquired by the threat actors. Some of the files appear to be related to depositions in litigation.

Finding no notice on the physicians’ web site or any press release, DataBreaches reached out to the provider last week via their on-site contact form and again today, with questions about the alleged attack and their response. DataBreaches also emailed Brain Cipher to request some additional details. Neither the provider nor the threat actors have replied as of publication.

At this point, then, we have no confirmation from PPSF, and Brain Cipher did not reveal when the alleged attack occurred. Did it happen shortly before their leak site notice or did it occur months ago? How many patients were affected? Did Brain Cipher lock any of their files or systems? Was patient care affected at all?

There is much we do not yet know — including whether PPSF will confirm or deny that they experienced any breach. This post will be updated if more information becomes available.

 

No related posts.

Category: Health DataMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← What is WikiLeaksV2 doing with a ransomware gang? Spoiler alert: It’s not extortion.
Alleged Data Breach at Korea Aerospace Research Institute Sparks Major Investigation →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Mississippi Law Firm Sues Cyber Insurer Over Coverage for Scam
  • Ukrainian Hackers Wipe 47TB of Data from Top Russian Military Drone Supplier
  • Computer Whiz Gets Suspended Sentence over 2019 Revenue Agency Data Breach
  • Ministry of Defence data breach timeline
  • Hackers Can Remotely Trigger the Brakes on American Trains and the Problem Has Been Ignored for Years
  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The patient data appears fake. (2)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The EU’s Plan To Ban Private Messaging Could Have a Global Impact (Plus: What To Do About It)
  • A Balancing Act: Privacy Issues And Responding to A Federal Subpoena Investigating Transgender Care
  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.