DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Massachusetts Eye and Ear responds to $1.5 million fine

Posted on September 18, 2012 by Dissent

In response to yesterday’s announcement that Massachusetts Eye and Ear would pay a $1.5 million fine and enter into a corrective action plan, MEE issued the following statement:

“The review of Mass. Eye and Ear by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was triggered by the hospital’s proactive self-reporting of a doctor’s unencrypted laptop being stolen while he was traveling abroad in 2010.  Mass. Eye and Ear has no indication that any patients were harmed by this isolated incident.

As a result of that incident, Mass. Eye and Ear cooperated extensively with HHS as HHS conducted an investigation of the hospital’s compliance with the federal standards under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA.)  The HHS investigation identified six areas of potential past non-compliance which were addressed by Mass. Eye and Ear between October 2009 and June 2010. These areas of potential non-compliance were primarily focused on controls to protect health information accessed or stored on portable electronic devices, such as laptop computers.

The rapid advancement of mobile technology has been both a boon and a bane for healthcare providers.  In the case of Mass. Eye and Ear, it has tremendous benefit for our doctors and our researchers, enabling them to collaborate and pursue their work while they are on the move.  It has also created new challenges for the entire healthcare community in the area of security safeguards.  Given the lack of patient harm discovered in this investigation, Mass. Eye and Ear was disappointed with the size of the fine, especially since the independent specialty hospital’s annual revenue is very small compared to other much larger institutions that have received smaller fines.

The agreement with HHS requires Mass. Eye and Ear to enter into a Corrective Action Plan (CAP), which includes risk assessment, the review and revision of policies and procedures, and the provision of training to our staff.  Mass. Eye and Ear had already implemented many of the elements of the CAP as part of our ongoing programs to safeguard the health information of our patients.  We will continue to work collaboratively with HHS and maintain our commitment to protecting our patients’ health information.”


Related:

  • Safaricom-Backed M-TIBA Victim of a Possible Data Breach Affecting Millions of Kenyans
  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Bakersfield medical group notifies patients and providers of stolen laptop
Northstar Healthcare exposes patients' e-mail addresses in e-mail blunder →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.