DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Two recent NYS audits of k-12 districts’ information technology security

Posted on July 5, 2024 by Dissent

The NYS Comptroller’s Office recently released more audits of school districts. Here are two of them:

Whitney Point Central School District – Information Technology (IT) (Broome County)

Audit Period

July 1, 2021 – February 24, 2023.
We extended our audit period to August 31, 2023 to review backup restoration results and November 16, 2023 to review updates to certain user accounts.

Audit Objective

Determine whether Whitney Point Central School District (District) officials adequately managed nonstudent network user accounts and developed and adopted a comprehensive information technology (IT) contingency plan.

Key Findings

District officials did not adequately manage nonstudent network user accounts, which are network user accounts not specifically assigned to a student (e.g., authorized staff, third-party vendors and shared accounts). Officials also did not adopt an IT contingency plan and were unaware of all the network users that had access to the District’s network. When nonstudent network user accounts are not adequately managed and an IT contingency plan is not adopted, the District has an increased risk that it could suffer a serious interruption to operations due to the risk to the network and potential inability to communicate during a disruption.

In addition to sensitive IT control weaknesses that we confidentially communicated to officials, District officials did not disable 19 nonstudent network user accounts (4 percent) that were not needed and/or used in more than five years. All of these user accounts were subsequently deleted during our audit fieldwork.

Key Recommendations

  • Develop written procedures for managing nonstudent network user accounts that include periodically reviewing user access and disabling unneeded and/or unused accounts.
  • Adopt a comprehensive IT contingency plan, update the plan as needed and distribute it to all responsible parties.

District officials generally agreed with our recommendations and have indicated they planned to initiate corrective action. Appendix B includes our comment on an issue that was raised in the District’s response letter.

Read the complete report (pdf).


Charter School of Educational Excellence – Information Technology

Audit Period

July 1, 2021 – May 24, 2023

Audit Objective

Determine whether the Charter School of Educational Excellence (School) Board of Trustees (Board) and officials secured student data to help protect it from unauthorized access and developed and adopted a comprehensive information technology (IT) contingency plan.

Key Findings

The Board and officials did not adequately secure student data to help protect it from unauthorized access or develop an IT contingency plan. As a result, there was an increased risk of unauthorized access to student personal, private and sensitive information (PPSI) and personally identifiable information (PII), and that the School could suffer a serious interruption to operations since its ability to communicate during a disruption or disaster could affect the timely processing of its business functions. In addition to sensitive IT control weaknesses which we communicated confidentially to School officials, we found:

  • School employees did not have guidance on how to properly identify and secure sensitive student data.
  • Three out of six tested users of the cloud-based application used for School operations stored sensitive student data without adequate protection, and 12 of the 125 users of the cloud-based Student Information System (SIS) had excessive or unnecessary access to view and modify sensitive student data.

Key Recommendations

  • Review, revise (if necessary), adopt and communicate the data classification policy to employees.
  • Ensure all access to sensitive student data is based on needs and job responsibilities.
  • Develop a written IT contingency plan.

School officials agreed with our recommendations and have initiated, or indicated they planned to initiate, corrective action.

Read the complete report (pdf)


Related:

  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • John Bolton Indictment Provides Interesting Details About Hack of His AOL Account and Extortion Attempt
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
  • Before Their Telegram Channel Was Banned Again, ScatteredLAPSUS$Hunters Dropped Files Doxing Government Employees (2)
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesEducation SectorU.S.

Post navigation

← Louisiana Special School District ransomware attack possibly compromised workers’ personal information
Ransomware group who hit Indonesian government apologizes, hands over encryption key →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.