DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

2nd Settlement Triggered by 2017 Ransomware Attack Costs WA Practice $100K; ‘Not a Breach’

Posted on October 21, 2024October 21, 2024 by Dissent

DataBreaches recently posted a press release from HHS OCR that announced a settlement with Cascade Eye and Skin Centers following a ransomware investigation. Theresa Defino of Report on Patient Privacy (RPP) dug into the incident and investigation more, and her reporting services as a great reminder that HHS’s press releases frequently do not really answer the kinds of questions we have about an incident or HHS’s enforcement actions and reasons. Her piece begins:

Let’s review for a moment.

It’s not a HIPAA violation to be a victim of ransomware.

It’s not a HIPAA violation to pay a ransom.

It’s up to the covered entity (CE) to determine if a security or privacy incident is a breach reportable to the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR), patients, the media and state regulators (though, of course, authorities could disagree later).

Yet, on June 17, Amber Gilroy, CEO of Cascade Eye and Skin Centers P.C. of Washington state, signed a settlement agreement with OCR that included a $250,000 payment and an extensive two-year corrective action plan (CAP).[1] OCR didn’t announce the settlement until three months later, and then, as it has with the previous three similar settlements, linked it to the growing incidence of ransomware afflicting health care organizations.

[…]

OCR’s investigation “found multiple potential violations of the HIPAA Security Rule, including failures by Cascade Eye and Skin Centers to conduct a compliant risk analysis to determine the potential risks and vulnerabilities to ePHI in its systems, and to have sufficient monitoring of its health information systems’ activity to protect against a cyber-attack,” it said. However, the settlement agreement itself enumerates just two: risk analysis and regular review of system activity.

Gilroy and Christiansen told RPP they “wanted to reiterate” that the $250,000 is “not based on any finding of a breach, despite the OCR press release implications.” Whether a breach occurred “wasn’t cited or discussed as a possible violation or the basis for the amount of the payment,” they said. As with most settlements, Cascade did not admit to wrongdoing.

Gilroy, who joined Cascade in May 2021, and Christiansen answered all of RPP’s questions except one: the amount of the ransomware.

Read what Defino learned on JDSupra.

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHealth DataHIPAAOf Note

Post navigation

← Dutch police post warning message in Telegram groups after four data broker arrests
Rocky Mountain Gastroenterology appears to have been attacked by three different groups; more than 169,000 patients affected (1) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Why Dumping Sensitive Data on Network Shares is a Liability
  • A militarily degraded Iran may turn to asymmetrical warfare – raising risk of proxy and cyber attacks
  • Pro-Russian hackers disrupt Dutch government websites ahead of NATO summit
  • Iran-Linked Threat Actors Leak Visitors and Athletes’ Data from Saudi Games
  • UK: Oxford City Council still investigating cyberattack from earlier this month
  • Steelmaker Nucor Says Hackers Stole Data in Recent Attack
  • People’s Republic of China cyber threat activity: Cyber Threat Bulletin
  • Ukrainian Web3 security auditing company Hacken suffered an attack that allowed a hacker to create 900 million HAI tokens
  • McLaren provides written notice to 743,131 patients after ransomware attack in July 2024 (2)
  • A state forensics lab was leaking its files. Getting it locked down involved a number of people.

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Sky Views Personal Data as a Potential Weapon in IPTV Piracy War
  • Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests
  • Federal Court Strikes Down HIPAA Reproductive Health Care Privacy Rule
  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.