DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

2nd Settlement Triggered by 2017 Ransomware Attack Costs WA Practice $100K; ‘Not a Breach’

Posted on October 21, 2024October 21, 2024 by Dissent

DataBreaches recently posted a press release from HHS OCR that announced a settlement with Cascade Eye and Skin Centers following a ransomware investigation. Theresa Defino of Report on Patient Privacy (RPP) dug into the incident and investigation more, and her reporting services as a great reminder that HHS’s press releases frequently do not really answer the kinds of questions we have about an incident or HHS’s enforcement actions and reasons. Her piece begins:

Let’s review for a moment.

It’s not a HIPAA violation to be a victim of ransomware.

It’s not a HIPAA violation to pay a ransom.

It’s up to the covered entity (CE) to determine if a security or privacy incident is a breach reportable to the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR), patients, the media and state regulators (though, of course, authorities could disagree later).

Yet, on June 17, Amber Gilroy, CEO of Cascade Eye and Skin Centers P.C. of Washington state, signed a settlement agreement with OCR that included a $250,000 payment and an extensive two-year corrective action plan (CAP).[1] OCR didn’t announce the settlement until three months later, and then, as it has with the previous three similar settlements, linked it to the growing incidence of ransomware afflicting health care organizations.

[…]

OCR’s investigation “found multiple potential violations of the HIPAA Security Rule, including failures by Cascade Eye and Skin Centers to conduct a compliant risk analysis to determine the potential risks and vulnerabilities to ePHI in its systems, and to have sufficient monitoring of its health information systems’ activity to protect against a cyber-attack,” it said. However, the settlement agreement itself enumerates just two: risk analysis and regular review of system activity.

Gilroy and Christiansen told RPP they “wanted to reiterate” that the $250,000 is “not based on any finding of a breach, despite the OCR press release implications.” Whether a breach occurred “wasn’t cited or discussed as a possible violation or the basis for the amount of the payment,” they said. As with most settlements, Cascade did not admit to wrongdoing.

Gilroy, who joined Cascade in May 2021, and Christiansen answered all of RPP’s questions except one: the amount of the ransomware.

Read what Defino learned on JDSupra.


Related:

  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • Bombay High Court Orders Department of Telecommunications to Block Medusa Accounts After Generali Insurance Data Breach
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHealth DataHIPAAOf Note

Post navigation

← Dutch police post warning message in Telegram groups after four data broker arrests
Rocky Mountain Gastroenterology appears to have been attacked by three different groups; more than 169,000 patients affected (1) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Checkout.com Discloses Data Breach After Extortion Attempt
  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Once a Patient’s in Custody, ICE Can Be at Hospital Bedsides — But Detainees Have Rights
  • OpenAI fights order to turn over millions of ChatGPT conversations
  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.