DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Attorney General Abbott Raises Privacy Concerns with HHS Rules Governing Obamacare’s ‘Navigator’ Program

Posted on August 18, 2013 by Dissent

Texas Attorney General Abbott issued the following statement after joining a coalition of state attorneys general who wrote to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius expressing concerns about Obamacare’s impending “navigator” program:

“Over the next few weeks, the Obama administration plans to dole out millions of taxpayer dollars to so-called ‘navigators’ who will be paid to help Americans navigate the Obamacare behemoth. Because these navigators will be granted substantial access to Americans’ personal information – including their Social Security numbers and tax information – I am deeply concerned about privacy and the security of this very sensitive information. To make matters worse, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ privacy rules that will govern these navigators are weak, lack clarity and fail to impose the accountability necessary to protect Texans’ privacy rights.”

In their letter, the state attorneys general identified and raised specific concerns about deficiencies in Obamacare’s “navigator” program. The states’ concerns included the following:
• Screening personnel. HHS’ rules do not plan to require uniform background or fingerprint checks for navigators. As a result, the rules do not adequately protect Texans by ensuring that convicted criminals or identity thieves will be prohibited from becoming navigators.
• Training and guidance for program personnel. HHS recently announced it may require navigators to complete only 20 hours of online courses before they start enrolling new Obamacare participants. Given the navigators’ access to Texans’ personal information, the attorneys general call upon HHS to identify the specific laws and standards that will govern the navigators’ use of Americans’ private information. Further, the attorneys general asked HHS to detail how it will ensure that navigators actually comply with all applicable privacy laws.
• Supplemental state regulation. Calling HHS’ substandard safeguards “a privacy disaster waiting to happen,” the attorneys general express support for state-based navigator certification or licensure requirements – such as those imposed by the Texas Legislature with the enactment of SB 1795 during the 2013 legislative session. The attorneys general also asked how HHS plans to prevent fraud and identity theft within navigator programs and whether HHS will provide help or relief to Americans who suffer identity theft or fraud due to a navigator’s misuse of individuals’ personal information.

In addition to expressing concerns about privacy issues raised with Obamacare’s navigator program, Attorney General Abbott reminded navigators that they must comply with Texas’s existing identity theft prevention statutes.

Read the letter from 13 Attorneys General.


Related:

  • Maintenance Note
  • CISA Alert: Reported Supply Chain Compromise Affecting XZ Utils Data Compression Library, CVE-2024-3094
  • System Status Note
  • System Status Note
  • Fraudster's fake data breach claims should remind media to be careful what we report
  • "Pompompurin" taken into custody after violating conditions of pre-sentencing release on bond (1)
Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Immortal cells, immortal life, and persisting questions of ethics and privacy
Data Protection audits in the NHS →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Checkout.com Discloses Data Breach After Extortion Attempt
  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • OpenAI fights order to turn over millions of ChatGPT conversations
  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.