DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

UK: Islington Council hit with monetary penalty after 2,375 residents' personal details published online

Posted on August 23, 2013 by Dissent

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has served Islington Council with a monetary penalty of £70,000 after personal details of over 2,300 residents were released online.

The information was inadvertently released in response to a freedom of information request, and revealed sensitive personal information relating to residents’ housing needs, including details of whether they had a history of mental illness or had been a victim of domestic abuse.

The freedom of information request had been made through the What Do They Know (WDTK) website, which enables individuals to submit requests for information to public authorities. Responses are uploaded to the site and are available to all those wishing to view them.

The council released three spreadsheets on the 26 and 27 June that related to the work of the authorities’ Housing Performance Team. The council failed to spot that the documents contained the details of 2,375 residents who had either submitted applications for council housing, or were council tenants.

These details were published on the WDTK website, and remained available until the 14 July when an administrator working for the site identified the error and removed the information. The website reported the matter to the ICO two days later.

The ICO’s investigation found that the council had been alerted to the problem shortly after the first spreadsheet was published, but failed to correct the error. This resulted in the other two spreadsheets being released with the same problem.

ICO Head of Enforcement, Stephen Eckersley, said:

“This mistake not only placed sensitive personal information relating to residents at risk, but also the highlighted the lack of training and expertise within the council. Councils are trusted with sensitive personal information, and residents are right to expect it to be handled in a proper way. Unfortunately, in this case that did not happen, and Islington Council must now explain to residents how it will stop these mistakes being repeated.”

The breach occurred due to a lack of understanding of pivot tables. These are used in Microsoft Excel and other spreadsheet programs to neatly summarise large amounts of data. But the tables retain a copy of the source data used. This information is hidden from view, but is easily accessible.

Islington Council used the tables to show statistics on how housing had been allocated to residents, but failed to remove the source data, and so sensitive personal data about tenants was revealed.

The ICO’s Head of Policy, Steve Wood, recently published a blog explaining the problems caused when public authorities fail to recognise the information retained in pivot tables. The ICO is currently investigating a number of other authorities that have also made similar errors.

 SOURCE: Information Commissioner’s Office


Related:

  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
  • Heritage Provider Network $49.99M Class Action Settlement
  • Integris Health Agrees to $30 Million Settlement Over 2023 Data Breach
  • They were victims of a massive data breach in 2009. Interior Health denied it for a decade.
  • Watsonville Community Hospital had a data breach -- or two. It would be helpful to know which.
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Pizza Hut Spain and Malta Data Analyst
IE: Abortion 'privacy breach' slammed →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.