DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Meanwhile, back at the Heartland breach

Posted on February 21, 2009 by Dissent

Like most blogs, DataBreaches.net totally abandoned any attempt to track all of the affected entities. Instead, we have been trying to support BankInfoSecurity.com‘s efforts to keep track. Expect the numbers of affected banks and credit unions to rise to 500 or more next week after they have a chance to enter about five dozen links to reports of affected institutions this site sent them in the past 24 hours. Not all reports assert unequivocally that their members’ or customers’ cards were affected, but all of the institutions were affected in terms of proactively replacing cards or in other ways. Some of the credit unions and banks did an excellent job of providing information on their web sites linked from their home page, while others did not make clear whether any of their customers were actually affected.

It is hard to fathom what the total cost of this breach will be. As one example, the North Carolina State Employees Credit Union was hit especially hard. Earlier this week, David Morrison of The Credit Union Times reported:

The $16.5 billion State Employees’ Credit Union has, so far, had more than 500,000 of its credit and debit cards involved in the Heartland Payment Systems breach and is facing the prospect of more, according to the credit union’s CEO Jim Blaine.

Blaine estimated the costs of closing accounts and reissuing plastics, so far, at more than $1.5 million. According to the credit union’s September 2008 call report, State Employees’ credit union has more than 190,000 credit card accounts and more than 1.6 million share draft accounts that are eligible for debit cards.

Then, too, there is the impact of consumers. Although many sources have indicated that the consumers have zero liability protection, for many consumers, their ability to function was impacted when banks suddenly imposed restrictions such as limiting cards to PIN-based transactions only and blocking signature-based transactions. Other institutions imposed caps on daily limits. This is a breach that has clearly affected many people already.

In a recent communication, Jason Maloni, Heartland spokesperson, indicated that the processor had been notified on October 28th by Visa and MasterCard after approximately 1,000 fraud reports led to them identifying Heartland as the source of the breach. In a separate statement on January 21, CUNA Mutual Group explained their part in uncovering the breach:

In October, CUNA Mutual notified Visa and MasterCard of higher-than-normal fraud activity after credit unions began informing the insurer of a spike in plastic card fraud and related activities. “CUNA Mutual Risk Management detected that something big was happening,” Cashman said. “We reported our findings to both card associations to help facilitate an investigation to determine if a breach had occurred and, if so, its origin.”


Related:

  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
  • Before Their Telegram Channel Was Banned Again, ScatteredLAPSUS$Hunters Dropped Files Doxing Government Employees (2)
  • Attorney General James Secures $14.2 Million from Car Insurance Companies Over Data Breaches
  • Months After Being Notified, a Software Vendor is Still Exposing Confidential and Sealed Court Records
Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← Tantalizing confirmation of another big breach
StayFriends members’ personal info exposed by SQL injection →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.