DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Meanwhile, back at the Heartland breach

Posted on February 21, 2009 by Dissent

Like most blogs, DataBreaches.net totally abandoned any attempt to track all of the affected entities. Instead, we have been trying to support BankInfoSecurity.com‘s efforts to keep track. Expect the numbers of affected banks and credit unions to rise to 500 or more next week after they have a chance to enter about five dozen links to reports of affected institutions this site sent them in the past 24 hours. Not all reports assert unequivocally that their members’ or customers’ cards were affected, but all of the institutions were affected in terms of proactively replacing cards or in other ways. Some of the credit unions and banks did an excellent job of providing information on their web sites linked from their home page, while others did not make clear whether any of their customers were actually affected.

It is hard to fathom what the total cost of this breach will be. As one example, the North Carolina State Employees Credit Union was hit especially hard. Earlier this week, David Morrison of The Credit Union Times reported:

The $16.5 billion State Employees’ Credit Union has, so far, had more than 500,000 of its credit and debit cards involved in the Heartland Payment Systems breach and is facing the prospect of more, according to the credit union’s CEO Jim Blaine.

Blaine estimated the costs of closing accounts and reissuing plastics, so far, at more than $1.5 million. According to the credit union’s September 2008 call report, State Employees’ credit union has more than 190,000 credit card accounts and more than 1.6 million share draft accounts that are eligible for debit cards.

Then, too, there is the impact of consumers. Although many sources have indicated that the consumers have zero liability protection, for many consumers, their ability to function was impacted when banks suddenly imposed restrictions such as limiting cards to PIN-based transactions only and blocking signature-based transactions. Other institutions imposed caps on daily limits. This is a breach that has clearly affected many people already.

In a recent communication, Jason Maloni, Heartland spokesperson, indicated that the processor had been notified on October 28th by Visa and MasterCard after approximately 1,000 fraud reports led to them identifying Heartland as the source of the breach. In a separate statement on January 21, CUNA Mutual Group explained their part in uncovering the breach:

In October, CUNA Mutual notified Visa and MasterCard of higher-than-normal fraud activity after credit unions began informing the insurer of a spike in plastic card fraud and related activities. “CUNA Mutual Risk Management detected that something big was happening,” Cashman said. “We reported our findings to both card associations to help facilitate an investigation to determine if a breach had occurred and, if so, its origin.”


Related:

  • Two more entities have folded after ransomware attacks
  • Microsoft Releases Urgent Patch for SharePoint RCE Flaw Exploited in Ongoing Cyber Attacks
  • Premier Health Partners issues a press release about a breach two years ago. Why was this needed now?
  • Missouri Adopts New Data Breach Notice Law
  • Qantas obtains injunction to prevent hacked data’s release
  • Global operation targets NoName057(16) pro-Russian cybercrime network in Operation Eastwood
Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← Tantalizing confirmation of another big breach
StayFriends members’ personal info exposed by SQL injection →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Scattered Spider Hijacks VMware ESXi to Deploy Ransomware on Critical U.S. Infrastructure
  • Hacker group “Silent Crow” claims responsibility for cyberattack on Russia’s Aeroflot
  • AIIMS ORBO Portal Vulnerability Exposing Sensitive Organ Donor Data Discovered by Researcher
  • Two Data Breaches in Three Years: McKenzie Health
  • Scattered Spider is running a VMware ESXi hacking spree
  • BreachForums — the one that went offline in April — reappears with a new founder/owner
  • Fans React After NASCAR Confirms Ransomware Breach
  • Allianz Life says ‘majority’ of customers’ personal data stolen in cyberattack (1)
  • Infinite Services notifying employees and patients of limited ransomware attack
  • The safe place for women to talk wasn’t so safe: hackers leak 13,000 user photos and IDs from the Tea app

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Congress tries to outlaw AI that jacks up prices based on what it knows about you
  • Microsoft’s controversial Recall feature is now blocked by Brave and AdGuard
  • Trump Administration Issues AI Action Plan and Series of AI Executive Orders
  • Indonesia asked to reassess data privacy terms in new U.S. trade deal
  • Meta Denies Tracking Menstrual Data in Flo Health Privacy Trial
  • Wikipedia seeks to shield contributors from UK law targeting online anonymity
  • British government reportedlu set to back down on secret iCloud backdoor after US pressure

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.