DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Global Financial Aid Services reports a completely avoidable security breach

Posted on June 3, 2011 by Dissent

For those who remember the Peter, Paul, and Mary song, feel free to sing along with me:  “When will they ever learn? Oh when will they ever learn?”

Global Financial Aid Services of Gulfport, Mississippi recently notified the New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office that a laptop containing unencrypted student names, addresses, and Social Security Numbers was stolen.

By letter dated May 23, GFAS noted that the theft occurred April 17 in a hotel conference area during  a symposium in Hawaii.

The total number of students affected by the breach was not indicated, but the letter to affected students is irritating to this privacy advocate, to say the least.   First, the letter claims that “We have taken steps to address it [the security situation] out of an abundance of caution.”  How is notifying people that they are now at increased risk or reminding your employees of proper security measures and protocols an “abundance of caution?”  It’s not.

Second, the letter tells the affected students, “The laptop is equipped with technology designed to prevent unauthorized access and we have no evidence your information has been accessed.”  What technology are they referring to? The password on the computer or something else? In their cover letter to the state, they do not indicate that the laptop was equipped with any software that would enable them to determine if the contents of the drive were accessed. So is this just a fancy way of making a simple password sound more protective than it really is or do they really have some genuine security technology on the laptop?

Third, although the cover letter to the state indicates that students’ addresses were on the laptop, the letter to students makes no mention of their addresses, and tells them that their “[client] account number, social security number and name” were stored on the computer.  The cover letter to the state does not inform the state that client account numbers were also involved.

So no, I am not impressed at all by the breach notification and disclosure.  And why, oh why, are we still seeing students’ Social Security Numbers in use for purposes that have nothing to do with Social Security, and why, oh why, are we still seeing laptops with unencrypted data being stolen?  Enough already…

/End of Rant


Related:

  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Confidence in ransomware recovery is high but actual success rates remain low
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • Bombay High Court Orders Department of Telecommunications to Block Medusa Accounts After Generali Insurance Data Breach
Category: Breach IncidentsCommentaries and AnalysesFinancial SectorTheftU.S.

Post navigation

← Three more reports to HHS revealed
How the Epsilon Breach Hurts Consumers →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.