DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Preliminary analysis of Stratfor data dump (updated)

Posted on December 27, 2011 by Dissent

Identity Finder has analyzed some of the data released from the Stratfor hack:

  • 50,277 unique credit card numbers, of which 9,651 are not expired
  • 86,594 email addresses, of which 47,680 are unique
  • 27,537 phone numbers, of which 25,680 are unique
  • 44,188 encrypted passwords, of which roughly 50 percent could be easily cracked
    • 73.7 percent of decrypted passwords were weak
    • 21.7 percent of decrypted passwords were medium strength
    • 4.6 percent of decrypted passwords were strong
    • Average decrypted password length: 7.1 characters
    • 10 percent of decrypted passwords were less than 5 characters long
    • Only 4.8 percent of decrypted passwords were 10+ characters long
    • Presumably the remaining non-decrypted passwords were stronger than the decrypted subset
  • 13,973 of the addresses belonged to United States victims; the remainder belonged to individuals from around the world

Read more on Identity Finder.

So they were storing approximately 40,000 credit card numbers in clear text that were expired?  This is really inexcusable. If the numbers could not be charged, why retain them – and their CVV?

Updated 1-4-12:  Their updated analysis was released on Dec. 30.  One big difference is that the updated figures show over 36,000 unexpired credit card numbers:

  • 68,063 Unique Credit Card Numbers, of which approximately 36,000 have unexpired expiration dates. Note: Credit cards with expired expiration dates might still be valid, if they have since been renewed.
  • 859,311 Unique Email addresses.
  • 50,569 Phone Numbers.
  • 860,160 Hashed Passwords, of which roughly 11.8% could be easily cracked.
  • Average password length: 7.2 Characters.
  • 50,618 of the addresses belonged to United States victims; the remainder belonged to individuals from other parts of the world.

Thanks to the reader who made me aware of the update.

Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorHackU.S.

Post navigation

← California Amendment Mandates A.G. Notification For Major Data Breaches
LulzXmas Donations by @DestructiveSec →

4 thoughts on “Preliminary analysis of Stratfor data dump (updated)”

  1. Chris L says:
    December 30, 2011 at 1:43 pm

    Where did you see that the CVVs were also retained?

    1. admin says:
      December 30, 2011 at 3:11 pm

      They announced that immediately. See my post at http://www.databreaches.net/?p=22426 that incorporates one of their tweets. But also, all you need to do is look at the data dumps they’ve been posting this past week and you’ll see the CVV’s.

      1. Chris L says:
        December 30, 2011 at 4:37 pm

        Oh, awesome. Somebody failed PCI 101.

        1. admin says:
          December 30, 2011 at 4:39 pm

          101, 102, 103, ……

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Lower Merion School District says a data breach was caused by a computer glitch
  • After $1 Million Ransom Demand, Virgin Islands Lottery Restores Operations Without Paying Hackers
  • Junior Defence Contractor Arrested For Leaking Indian Naval Secrets To Suspected Pakistani Spies
  • Mysterious leaker GangExposed outs Conti kingpins in massive ransomware data dump
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • Class action settlement following ransomware attack will cost Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center about $52 million
  • Comstar LLC agrees to corrective action plan and fine to settle HHS OCR charges
  • Australian ransomware victims now must tell the government if they pay up
  • U.S. Sanctions Cloud Provider ‘Funnull’ as Top Source of ‘Pig Butchering’ Scams
  • Victoria’s Secret takes down website after security incident

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Fears Grow Over ICE’s Reach Into Schools
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.
  • Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment
  • Watch out for activist judges trying to deprive us of our rights to safe reproductive healthcare
  • Nebraska Bans Minor Social Media Accounts Without Parental Consent
  • Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.