DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

My Turn: Are we ready for e-medical records?

Posted on April 14, 2008October 24, 2024 by Dissent

The following opinion piece, which was written by Allen Gilbert, the Executive Director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Vermont, appeared in the Burlington Free Press today:

Allen Gilbert Vermont is about to take a huge, expensive leap into the electronic medical records field. Every Vermonter who’s ever seen a doctor or been to the hospital will be affected.

The state’s Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities, and Health Care Administration has given the green light to Fletcher Allen Health Care to spend $89 million over three years to build an e-medical records system for its hospital and 750 affiliated physicians — about half of the state’s doctors.

And the Legislature is poised to impose a surcharge on medical claims that will raise $32 million over 10 years for Vermont Information Technology Leaders. The money will be used by the public-private group to build a statewide system linking all hospitals and physicians so patient records can be sent electronically among health care providers.

Eventually, planners say, the entire nation will be linked so our health care records can be accessed anywhere, anytime — sort of a medical records ATM system.

A digitized health records system might be a very good idea. Proponents say it will improve care and save money.

It very well might improve care. Whether it will save money, however, is still being debated. Studies of existing systems show that if there are savings, they go to insurers, not doctors or patients.

What is not a good idea, though, is to plunge into this vast, expensive undertaking without a solid plan in place that has strict standards to protect the privacy of our medical records. And that hasn’t happened.

[…]

Fletcher Allen’s system, because of its scope, will drive the design of VITL’s statewide system. Let’s hope the standards set by the Wisconsin contractor hired by Fletcher Allen are sufficient to protect Vermonters’ privacy as records travel around the state, to nearby hospitals such as Dartmouth-Hitchcock and Albany Medical, and eventually to providers anywhere in the country. The Legislature’s decision to provide VITL with $32 million means that eventually every doctor’s office in the state will be connected to this vast network.

This is a big step for us to take. Are we ready for it? Our care, our privacy, and a lot of money are at stake. So far, the planning and review envisioned in state law have not been of the rigor one might hope.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Legally eHealth: Putting eHealth in its European Legal Context
Lawyers: Doctor's info leak justified / Defense says psychiatrist wanted to show teenaged suspect did not intend to kill →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ransomware group Gunra claims to have exfiltrated 450 million patient records from American Hospital Dubai.
  • North Shore University Sleep Disorders Center employee charged with secretly recording patients in restrooms
  • When ransomware listings create confusion as to who the victim was
  • Rajkot civic body’s GIS website hit by cyber attack, over 400 GB data feared stolen
  • Taiwan’s BitoPro hit by NT$345 million cryptocurrency hack
  • Texas gastroenterology and surgical practice victim of ransomware attack
  • Romanian Citizen Pleads Guilty to ‘Swatting’ Numerous Members of Congress, Churches, and Former U.S. President
  • North Dakota Enacts Financial Data Security and Data Breach Notification Requirements
  • Pro-Ukraine hacker group Black Owl poses ‘major threat’ to Russia, Kaspersky says
  • Vanta bug exposed customers’ data to other customers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Florida ban on kids using social media likely unconstitutional, judge rules
  • State Data Minimization Laws Spark Compliance Uncertainty
  • Supreme Court Agrees to Clarify Emergency Situations Where Police Don’t Need Warrant
  • Stewart Baker vs. Orin Kerr on “The Digital Fourth Amendment”
  • Fears Grow Over ICE’s Reach Into Schools
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.