DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

National American University students’ financial information exposed, but what laws protect them?

Posted on December 8, 2013 by Dissent

Joe O’Sullivan reports:

When National American University moved from one Rapid City campus to a new location earlier this year, the school or a contractor appears to have improperly disposed of thousands of sensitive student financial records that included names, addresses, loan numbers and Social Security numbers, according to documents reviewed by the Rapid City Journal.

The private information, which was reportedly dumped into a trash bin, was brought to the newspaper by a person who lived across the street from NAU’s old campus at 321 Kansas City St.

Read more on Rapid City Journal.

National American University is a for-profit university owned by National American University Holdings, Inc., a publicly traded company.  They are covered by FERPA and other laws:

We are subject to many laws and regulations related to the nature of our business, including but not limited to Title IV of the U.S. Higher Education Act of 1965, laws and regulations administered by the DOE and laws and regulations related to the establishment and relationship with preferred lenders for student financial aid. It is essential to our business that we are at all times in compliance with these and other applicable laws and regulations.

They also assure students in their privacy statement:

We use industry-standard security measures to protect any personal information that you may provide to us.

So… did they rush to secure the documents or start an investigation when notified of the exposed financial documents?   O’Sullivan reports:

In an email to the Journal, Thomas Johnson, an attorney representing NAU, said the university’s position is that financial documents were properly handled during the move, or should have been destroyed by a firm hired by NAU.

“During the re-location of the university’s Rapid City campus, documents containing private student data were either moved to the new campus or were to be destroyed in a secure manner by a third-party vendor retained by the University,” Johnson wrote.

Nonetheless, in a call Friday afternoon, Johnson said NAU is taking the allegation seriously and the university will begin investigating next week.

“Our priority is to figure whether there was a breach here, and who was involved,” Johnson said. “NAU takes seriously those responsibilities, they have protocol in place, and believed they followed protocols in place.”

There was no mention of rushing to secure the files. Why didn’t NAU immediately dispatch staff to determine what else might be left in the trash that contained personal information?  Could personal data have still been sitting in the bin all weekend for anyone’s taking? Or if they did rush to investigate, it wasn’t reported by O’Sullivan.

But wait, this gets worse, if you can believe it. South Dakota has no state data breach notification law. And although FERPA requires protection of private records, it does not mandate breach notification in the event of a breach. So where does that leave those affected by this breach? If I’m understanding federal laws properly, NAU is likely obligated under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to notify individuals whose financial data were exposed and left unsecured. Whether NAU would agree with my understanding remains to be seen.

And if they do notify individuals, will they also offer them free credit monitoring or insist that their contractor does if it turns out the contractor violated some written agreement on secure disposal?

The FTC has the authority to enforce the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. And although they generally do not get involved in education-related data breaches, this might be a good one for them to investigate. Well, this one and the Maricopa Community Colleges breach also reported this week.

Dammit, someone’s got to get serious about breaches in the education sector. If USED won’t or can’t, and state attorneys general don’t or can’t, then paging FTC to Aisle 4….

Category: Breach IncidentsCommentaries and AnalysesEducation SectorExposureOf NotePaperSubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← Credit card fraud in Lake Saint Louis traced to skimmer; suspects apprehended
Chinese hackers leak 20 million hotel guests’ data on WeChat →

3 thoughts on “National American University students’ financial information exposed, but what laws protect them?”

  1. Carl says:
    December 9, 2013 at 2:25 pm

    state breach laws would affect them even if they lost the data in south Dakota – most breach laws are applicable to the state of residency for the individual – not where the data was lost – aka – if you live in NY and your data is at a South Dakota company, them NY laws apply — not just the laws for the State the data was lost in.

    1. Dissent says:
      December 9, 2013 at 2:46 pm

      Yes, but many state breach laws only apply to computerized (electronic) database breaches. It’s not clear whether printouts from the database would also be covered. Then, too, unless NAU retrieves the documents, they have no idea whom to notify should they discover that they’re obligated to.

      1. Carl says:
        December 10, 2013 at 4:11 pm

        good point -GLBA has privacy requirements – as does FACT Act (as well as document disposal requirements) – if they were database printouts, if they started as “electronic” records, I wonder if they would still be considered a data breach – State constitutions provide another source of protection. Constitutions in ten states–Alaska, Arizona, California, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, Montana, South Carolina, and Washington–expressly recognize a right to privacy – perhaps these would apply –

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon
  • US govt login portal could be one cyberattack away from collapse, say auditors
  • Two Men Sentenced to Prison for Aggravated Identity Theft and Computer Hacking Crimes
  • 100,000 UK taxpayer accounts hit in £47m phishing attack on HMRC
  • CISA Alert: Updated Guidance on Play Ransomware
  • Almost one year later, U.S. Dermatology Partners is still not being very transparent about their 2024 breach

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant
  • US State Dept. says silence or anonymity on social media is suspicious

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.