DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

2005 called and they want their reassurances back

Posted on May 7, 2014 by Dissent

Am I the only one who actually feels embarrassed these days to read a breach notification  that tries to reassure those notified by emphasizing that the data were password protected?  Consider this excerpt from a breach notification written last month:

However, the information on the server is password protected. Accordingly, for any unauthorized person to gain access to any of the information contained on our server, they would first have to know and enter a confidential password for the computer system.

Our firm believes the equipment, which was stolen, was probably taken for the value of the hardware, rather than the information contained on it. Additionally, as set forth above, the information is password protected, and it is unlikely that unauthorized persons would be unable (sic) to break through the password security system in order to access confidential data.

From the notification letter sent by Green’s Accounting, concerning a burglary that resulted in theft of a server with unencrypted personal information.

What really scares me is the possibility they believe that a password is sufficient protection for Social Security numbers and bank account information.  Their letter does not indicate that they plan to start encrypting data. Nor does it mention, for that matter, what they intend to do about their physical security to prevent another burglary. If all it took was breaking a window with a rock, well, that doesn’t sound like great physical security was in place.


Related:

  • Toys “R” Us Canada customers notified of breach of personal information
  • Gatineau gymnastics centre warns members of possible data breach
  • Hotel and Casino near Las Vegas Strip suffers data breach, documents say
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • Data BreachesProsper Data Breach Impacts 17.6 Million Accounts
  • Gov't seeks police probe of KT for allegedly obstructing data breach investigation
Category: Business SectorTheft

Post navigation

← OCR dismisses Walgreens ‘Well Experience’ HIPAA complaint
Boulder Community Health investigating patient records allegedly acquired from unlocked bins or dumpsters →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.