DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Incident Summary #4: Service provider inadvertently discloses email addresses of nearly 300 customers in mass email

Posted on December 20, 2014 by Dissent

Posted yesterday by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada:

Service provider inadvertently discloses email addresses of nearly 300 customers in mass email

Incident

A customer of a service provider received a routine email from the service provider advising her of when her seasonal service would be reconnected. However, she noticed that the email had also been simultaneously sent to many other customers, whose email addresses were clearly visible, as was her own, in the address field. As a result, the customer alerted our Office about the incident.

Outcome

The service provider advised our Office that nine mass emails had occurred on that day, involving nearly 300 email addresses of individual customers. The organization explained that in these mass emails, the email address of each recipient had been displayed and shared with multiple customers since the addresses had been entered into the “cc” field rather than the “bcc” field.

Within the first half hour of detecting the error, the organization made attempts to recall all unopened emails to mitigate the impact on customers. Each customer impacted by the incident received a subsequent email from the organization, containing an apology for the error, a description of it and the actions that were taken to rectify the situation. Customers were also given the contact information of a supervisor with whom they could discuss the incident if they wished. Later, communications were sent to, and learning sessions were held with, managers, supervisors and company leaders to inform them of the incident, with a view to implementing a more secure, automated process/system for sending out mass emails.

Consequently, within a week of the incident, a new process for best practices when sending out mass emails was established for the organization. The new process includes: (a) avoiding mass emails, in general, and using alternative and more personal methods of contact (i.e., phone) wherever possible; (b) involving the marketing team for mass emails that need to be sent; (c) requiring supervisor and manager review and approval of mass emails prior to being sent; (d) using a mail merger program to ensure confidentialilty; and (e) ensuring that mass emails being sent do not contain the confidential information of customers.

Final Comment

The service provider was able to demonstrate to our Office that it implemented best practices for sending mass e-mails in response to this incident. Our Office strongly encourages other organizations subject to the Act to implement similar processes to avoid an inadvertent disclosure of personal information when sending a mass email to its customers.

Category: Business SectorExposureNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← VA: Security Incident Involving James Madison University Network
Court case places patient-physician relationship in the balance →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon
  • US govt login portal could be one cyberattack away from collapse, say auditors
  • Two Men Sentenced to Prison for Aggravated Identity Theft and Computer Hacking Crimes
  • 100,000 UK taxpayer accounts hit in £47m phishing attack on HMRC
  • CISA Alert: Updated Guidance on Play Ransomware
  • Almost one year later, U.S. Dermatology Partners is still not being very transparent about their 2024 breach

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant
  • US State Dept. says silence or anonymity on social media is suspicious

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.