DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Seven Sacramento Residents Indicted for Identity and Mail Theft Scheme

Posted on June 4, 2015 by Dissent

A federal grand jury returned a 13-count indictment today against seven Sacramento residents, charging them with conspiracy, access device fraud, aggravated identity theft, and possession of stolen mail, United States Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner announced.

The indictment alleges that co-defendants Steven Khamkeuanekeo, 33, Kay Lee, 26, Chee Yang, 27, Frank Her, 36, Amy Her, 33, Lee Yang, 33, and Tou Her, 36, conspired to use unauthorized access devices at large retailers and stole victims’ identities through stolen mail.

According to the indictment, from July 2014 through April 2015, the conspirators obtained personal information from victims through various methods. The conspirators then used that information to create counterfeit access devices or otherwise used unauthorized access devices to obtain things of value in excess of $1,000. Part of the scheme involved using Target store account numbers to buy large amounts of electronics and other goods at Target locations throughout the Sacramento area. The indictment further alleges that one of the defendants, Frank Her, possessed device-making equipment with the intent to defraud.

In all, the indictment alleges that at least 500 counterfeit and unauthorized access devices were possessed, used, produced, or trafficked by members of the conspiracy, and over 2200 victims have been identified to date as having had their identities or mail compromised as a result of the conspiracy.

This case is the product of an investigation by the United States Postal Inspection Service. Assistant United States Attorney Matthew M. Yelovich is prosecuting the case.

If the defendants are convicted, they face maximum statutory penalties ranging from five to 15 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Any sentence, however, would be determined at the discretion of the court after consideration of any applicable statutory factors and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account a number of variables. The charges are only allegations; the defendants are presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

SOURCE: U.S.A.O, Eastern District of California


Related:

  • They were victims of a massive data breach in 2009. Interior Health denied it for a decade.
  • The Identity Theft Resource Center Remains Open to Victims Amid Government Shutdown
  • Kosovo National Pleads Guilty To Operating An Online Criminal Marketplace
  • Fake ID website busted; Dutch police deal a blow to criminal infrastructure
  • Two Defendants Plead Guilty To Fraud Scheme Involving Data Stolen From Hospital Patients
  • 39-year-old Nigerian extradited to US from France over alleged hacking
Category: ID Theft

Post navigation

← OPM notifying 4 million current and former federal employees of hack
Human error to blame as UK data breach investigations surge →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.