DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Three plead guilty to accessing slain anchor's medical records

Posted on July 20, 2009 by Dissent

A physician and two former employees of the St. Vincent Health System pleaded guilty today to misdemeanor federal charges for accessing the medical records of slain television anchor Anne Pressly, the U.S. attorney’s office and FBI announced.

Dr. Jay Holland and Candida Griffin, both of Little Rock, and Sarah Elizabeth Miller of England, appeared separately before U.S. Magistrate Henry L. Jones Jr. Each pleaded to a misdemeanor violation of health information privacy provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

The three admitted to accessing a patient’s record without any legitimate purpose. Each faces up to a year in prison and-or a fine of up to $50,000. Sentencing has not been set.

Pressly, a morning anchor for Little Rock television station KATV, was found severely beaten in her Little Rock home on Oct. 20. She died five days later without regaining consciousness.

Police arrested Curtis Lavelle Vance on a capital murder charge Nov. 26.

Officials at St. Vincent Infirmary Medical Center suspended the hospital privileges of Holland, 56, for two weeks and required him to complete on-line HIPAA training.

St. Vincent fired Miller, 28, from her job as an account representative at the system’s Sherwood Campus and Griffin, 34, from her job as emergency room unit coordinator at the Little Rock hospital.

Read more in Arkansas News.

Although this is not the first time that there has been a prosecution under HIPAA, such cases are still exceedingly rare. And once again, it seems to be simple curiosity and not intention to sell or otherwise misuse protected health information. As we’ve discussed in another thread, although highly publicized cases where people are charged or experience severe consequences might be some small help in deterring snooping, it is almost certainly not enough.

Nor is this the first case where physicians have not been fired while non-physicians have been fired for the same offense. Does that seem fair or appropriate or justifiable to you?


Related:

  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
  • Heritage Provider Network $49.99M Class Action Settlement
  • Integris Health Agrees to $30 Million Settlement Over 2023 Data Breach
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Free Webinar: Detecting Record Snooping & Automating Compliance
Deborah Peel: Comments on guilty plea →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.