DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Demand letter served on poll body over disastrous ‘Comeleak’ breach

Posted on April 26, 2016 by Dissent

There continues to be a lot of media coverage of the COMELEC breach in the Philippines. Here’s an interesting response. Carlos Nazareno reports:

The Center for International Law Philippines (Centerlaw), a human rights legal group, delivered on Monday, April 25, a demand letter to the Commission on Elections (Comelec) over its possible failure to reasonably protect the sensitive private data of registered voters that resulted in the hacking and leaking incident dubbed #Comeleak.

In his individual capacity as a private citizen, Jose Ramon Albert, senior research fellow of the Philippine Institute for Development Studies, formally demanded that the Comelec notify the National Privacy Commission the nature of the breach, the sensitive personal information involved, and the measures taken by poll agency to address the breach and who are the officials designated by the Comelec as accountable for its compliance with RA 10173 or the Data Privacy Act of 2012.

Albert, who is the former secretary general of the National Statistical Coordination Board and member of the Privacy Advisory Group of the United Nations Global Pulse, was assisted by lawyer Romel Bagares of Centerlaw.

The demand letter reminded members of the Comelec that, “Under Section 30 of the Data Privacy Act, it is a crime to conceal security breaches involving sensitive personal information, with a penalty of imprisonment of one year and six months to five years and a fine of not less than P500,000.00 but not more than P1,000,000.00.”

The Comelec has been given 24 hours to respond, after which a formal complaint will be filed against the poll body by Albert via Centerlaw before the National Privacy Commission.

Read more on Newsbytes.ph.

I don’t know if their approach will be effective, but I like it. It’s one thing to ask for more time to investigate, but it really doesn’t take that long to verify whether a leaked database contains real data, even if you haven’t verified all of it. Contrast COMELEC’s approach with that of the INE in Mexico who took a bit of time to investigate and then publicly confirmed that the leaked list was from the official February, 2015 list.

Governments need to be held strictly accountable when there’s a breach of this magnitude, and they need to be transparent. Keeping the public waiting for confirmation should result in heads rolling, criminal charges, or huge personal fines that insurance will not cover.


Related:

  • US company with access to biggest telecom firms uncovers breach by nation-state hackers
  • Canada says hacktivists breached water and energy facilities
  • UK: FCA fines former employee of Virgin Media O2 for data protection breach
  • Former General Manager for U.S. Defense Contractor Pleads Guilty to Selling Stolen Trade Secrets to Russian Broker
  • The 4TB time bomb: when EY's cloud went public (and what it taught us)
  • China Amends Cybersecurity Law and Incident Reporting Regime to Address AI and Infrastructure Risks
Category: ExposureGovernment SectorHackNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Hacker With Victims in 100 Nations Gets 7 Years in Prison
VEHICLE CYBERSECURITY: DOT and Industry Have Efforts Under Way, but DOT Needs to Define Its Role in Responding to a Real-world Attack →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Report released on PowerSchool cyber attack
  • Sue The Hackers – Google Sues Over Phishing as a Service
  • Princeton University Data Breach Impacts Alumni, Students, Employees
  • Eurofiber admits crooks swiped data from French unit after cyberattack
  • Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
  • French agency Pajemploi reports data breach affecting 1.2M people
  • From bad to worse: Doctor Alliance hacked again by same threat actor (1)
  • Surveillance tech provider Protei was hacked, its data stolen, and its website defaced
  • Checkout.com Discloses Data Breach After Extortion Attempt
  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data
  • India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force
  • Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
  • Keeping Cool When ICE Arrives: Basic Raid Response Strategies for Laboratories
  • IRS Accessed Massive Database of Americans Flights Without a Warrant

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.