DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Coney Island Hospital notifies patients of….. what?

Posted on May 17, 2017 by Dissent

Crain’s reports:

A volunteer at NYC Health + Hospitals/Coney Island gained unauthorized access to the protected health information of nearly 3,500 patients, the hospital told the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services last week.

The volunteer in Coney Island’s phlebotomy department entered patient names in a logbook, cleaned up data storage areas and transported specimens within the hospital—without being vetted beforehand by Coney Island’s human resources department, hospital chief executive Anthony Rajkumar wrote in a sample letter to affected patients.

“NYC Health + Hospitals apologizes for the concern this incident may have caused and assures you that we are doing everything we can to make sure an incident of this nature does not reoccur,” Rajkumar wrote.

Read more on Crain’s New York.

But what was the breach? Was there any wrongdoing by the volunteer at all, or is this just a case where the hospital erred in giving this person access to PHI but the person did nothing wrong with it? Was this a “what might have happened buy didn’t” notification?

DataBreaches.net called the hospital to inquire, and asked whether the volunteer had done anything untoward or if this was just a case of the volunteer not having been properly vetted by HR.  A hospital spokesperson replied, “this individual did not go through the appropriate human resources process for volunteers, which is a violation of the hospital’s policies and practices.”

 

No related posts.

Category: Breach IncidentsHealth Data

Post navigation

← EPIC v. FBI: Agency Cyber Hack Notification Procedures Fall Short
“Shoot the messenger:” NYC hospital and vendor threaten DataBreaches.net for reporting on their security failure →

1 thought on “Coney Island Hospital notifies patients of….. what?”

  1. Anonymous says:
    May 18, 2017 at 10:12 am

    Presumably the volunteer had not signed the typical employee agreements which dictate privacy policies, NDAs, etc. Therefore PII and PHI were technically leaked to an unauthorized third party.

    The volunteer has since probably signed paperwork stating that they did not, and will not, disseminate any privileged information.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The data appear fake. (1)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases
  • Multiple lawsuits filed against Doyon Ltd over April 2024 data breach and late notification
  • Chinese hackers suspected in breach of powerful DC law firm
  • Qilin Emerged as The Most Active Group, Exploiting Unpatched Fortinet Vulnerabilities
  • CISA tags Citrix Bleed 2 as exploited, gives agencies a day to patch
  • McDonald’s McHire leak involving ‘123456’ admin password exposes 64 million applicant chat records

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’
  • DeleteMyInfo Wins 2025 Digital Privacy Excellence Award from Internet Safety Council
  • TikTok Loses First Appeal Against £12.7M ICO Fine, Faces Second Investigation by DPC

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.