DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

AMP Global Clearing LLC fined for lax security

Posted on February 12, 2018 by Dissent
A monetary penalty resulted from a misconfigured backup uncovered by Chris Vickery, who was then with Kromtech Security. It was reported publicly in April, 2017 by a number of outlets, including The Daily Dot. This was one of those cases where a vendor’s mistake turned out to be costly. 
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today issued an Order filing and simultaneously settling charges against AMP Global Clearing LLC (AMP), a registered Futures Commission Merchant since 2010, for its failure between June 21, 2016 and April 17, 2017 to supervise diligently the implementation of critical provisions in AMP’s information systems security program (ISSP).

As a result of this failure, a significant amount of AMP’s customers’ records and information were left unprotected for nearly ten months. In April 2017, as a result of this failure, a third party unaffiliated with AMP (Third Party) accessed AMP’s information technology network and copied approximately 97,000 files, which included customers’ records and information, including personally identifiable information. The Third Party thereafter contacted federal authorities about securing the copied information, and subsequently informed AMP that the copied information had been secured and was no longer in the Third Party’s possession. After becoming aware of the vulnerability and unauthorized access, AMP cooperated with the CFTC and worked diligently to remediate the issue.

CFTC’s Director of Enforcement Comments

James McDonald, the CFTC’s Director of Enforcement, commented: “Entities entrusted with sensitive information must work diligently to protect that information. That’s not only good business, but when it comes to registrants in our markets, it’s the law. As this case shows, the CFTC will work hard to ensure regulated entities live up to that responsibility, which has taken on increasing importance as cyber threats extend across our financial system.”

Specifically, the Order finds that AMP failed to supervise its IT Provider’s implementation of ISSP provisions it was delegated with implementing under AMP’s supervision, including identifying and performing risk assessments of access routes into AMP’s network, performing quarterly network risk assessments to identify vulnerabilities, maintaining strict firewall rules, and detecting unauthorized activity on the network. This failure left a significant amount of AMP’s customers’ records and information vulnerable to cyber-exploitation for nearly ten months, until the Third Party accessed AMP’s network.

The Order finds that the vulnerability in AMP’s network involved an open access route in a network attached storage device (NASD). Three successive quarterly network risk assessments failed to identify this vulnerability. Indeed, the Order finds that, before the Third Party accessed the NASD’s contents, the media had reported three other incidents of unauthorized access of NASDs used by organizations other than AMP, including some from the same manufacturer of AMP’s NASD. Yet AMP did not detect the vulnerability until its network was accessed and customer records and information compromised.

The Order requires AMP to pay a $100,000 civil monetary penalty and cease and desist from violating the CFTC regulation governing diligent supervision. The Order further requires AMP to provide two written follow-up reports, within one-year of entry of the Order, to the CFTC verifying AMP’s ongoing efforts to maintain and strengthen the security of its network and its compliance with its ISSP’s requirements.

The Order recognizes AMP’s substantial cooperation and remediation during the CFTC’s Division of Enforcement’s investigation of this matter, which included providing important information and analysis to the Division that helped the Division to efficiently and effectively undertake its investigation. The Order notes that the civil monetary penalty imposed on AMP reflects AMP’s cooperation.

The CFTC thanks the Securities and Exchange Commission for its assistance in this matter.

Jeremy Christianson and Christopher Beatty from the CFTC’s Office of Data and Technology also provided assistance in this matter.

CFTC Division of Enforcement staff members responsible for this action are Harry E. Wedewer, Trevor Kokal, Candice Aloisi, Lenel Hickson, Jr., and Manal M. Sultan.

Source: CFTC
h/t, @NeiraJones

Related:

  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • Hotel and Casino near Las Vegas Strip suffers data breach, documents say
  • Bombay High Court Orders Department of Telecommunications to Block Medusa Accounts After Generali Insurance Data Breach
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
Category: Business SectorCommentaries and AnalysesOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Entergy notifies employees of W-2 breach involving TALX portal
Idaho Transportation Department email hack may have exposed truckers’ private information →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Two suspected Scattered Spider hackers plead not guilty over Transport for London cyberattack
  • Attleboro investigating ‘cybersecurity incident’ impacting city’s IT systems
  • Fired techie admits sabotaging ex-employer, causing $862K in damage
  • Threat actors have reportedly launched yet another campaign involving an application connected to Salesforce
  • Russian hackers target IVF clinics across UK used by thousands of couples
  • US, allies sanction Russian bulletproof hosting services for ransomware support
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches
  • Report released on PowerSchool cyber attack
  • Sue The Hackers – Google Sues Over Phishing as a Service

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Cole v. Quest Diagnostics: The Third Circuit Weighs in on Pixels, Privacy, and Medical Data
  • Closing the Privacy Gap: HIPRA Targets Health Apps and Wearables
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data
  • India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.