DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Settlement in 2015 UCLA Health Data Breach Class Action

Posted on March 21, 2019 by Dissent

Top Class Actions reports:

A $7.5 million class action settlement has been reached, resolving claims that a July 2015 data breach exposed personal information stored by the UCLA Health Network.

The UCLA Health class action settlement provides $2 million to pay for unreimbursed loss claims and preventative measure claims. In addition, UCLA Heath has agreed to set up a cybersecurity enhancement fund of $5.5 million.

Read more and find the claim submission form for eligible class members on Top Class Actions.

UCLA Health Network’s original release about the incident can be read here.  OCR closed its investigation of the incident with the following note/summary:

A hacker accessed parts of the covered entity’s (CE) computer network that contained the clinical and demographic information of approximately 4,500,000 individuals. The CE reported the incident to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and conducted a forensic analysis of the incident. The CE provided breach notification to HHS, affected individuals, and the media, and also posted substitute notice. Following the breach, the CE implemented technical and administrative safeguards designed to help detect and contain any future cyber-attacks. OCR obtained assurances that the CE implemented the corrective actions above.

So that was it as far as HHS was concerned, but of course, that doesn’t stop anyone from suing an entity over a breach. The consolidated case is:
Adlouni v. UCLA Health System Auxiliary, et al., Case No. BC589243, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles.

The final court hearing is scheduled for June 18, 2019.

I’m curious as to what the additional $5.5 million security enhancements are to be — and are these over and above what UCLA Health Network had already agreed to implement as part of HHS’s investigation? Maybe someone can do a deeper dive into the security upgrade issue in this case.


Related:

  • Kaufman County's data breach was their second one in three weeks
  • Hacking Formula 1: Accessing Max Verstappen's passport and PII through FIA bugs
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • Hotel and Casino near Las Vegas Strip suffers data breach, documents say
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHackHealth DataOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Ca: Shredding company denies responsibility for incident involving Grand Villa Casino cards
The Lawyer’s Duty When Client Confidential Information is Hacked From the Law Firm →

1 thought on “Settlement in 2015 UCLA Health Data Breach Class Action”

  1. Linda Desousa says:
    March 30, 2019 at 5:31 am

    I was at this hospital in 2014 west La. CA
    what do I need to do

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.