DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Five months after disclosing a patient PHI breach involving employee email accounts, Metrocare discloses a second, identical, breach?

Posted on April 16, 2019 by Dissent

On April 5, Metrocare Services in Texas notified HHS that it was notifying 5,290 clients of a breach. A notice on their web site explains:

On February 6, 2019, we learned an unauthorized third party gained access into some Metrocare employees’ email accounts beginning on January 2019. We immediately took steps to secure the accounts and began an investigation. The investigation determined the unauthorized access occurred and could not rule out whether emails containing individuals’ information were accessed by the third party. We determined information of some individuals were in the affected email accounts, and may have included individuals’ names, dates of birth, health insurance information, driver’s license information, health information related to services received connected to Metrocare, and in some cases, Social Security numbers.

You can read the full notice on their site, which includes steps they have taken to prevent a recurrence. It’s a shame they didn’t take all of these steps in November, 2018 when they had what sounds like an identical breach, but did not follow up by implementing multifactor authentication. At that time, they wrote:

To help prevent something like this from happening in the future, Metrocare is taking steps to add additional security measures to its current information technology infrastructure, including strengthening its email system, and providing additional information security training to its employees.

That incident has no closing summary on HHS’s public breach, so it may still be under investigation.

This time, they write:

To help prevent something like this from happening in the future, we are taking steps to add additional security measures to our current information technology infrastructure, including strengthening the security of our e-mail system and have implemented multi-factor authentication on its email systems.

The breach in 2018 affected more than 1,800 patients. The more recent breach, which was also discovered within a month after it started, affected more than 5,200 patients. Will OCR find Metrocare’s actions reasonable? And what happens if this happens again?

 

Category: Breach IncidentsHealth Data

Post navigation

← Experts: Breach at IT Outsourcing Giant Wipro
EU: No evidence of Kaspersky spying despite ‘confirmed malicious’ classification →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack
  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.