DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Personal And Social Information Of 1.2 Billion People Discovered In Massive Data Leak, But Who’s Responsible??

Posted on November 22, 2019 by Dissent

Over on DataViper.io, Vinny Troia reports that he and Bob Diachenko found a massive data leak that appears to implicate two data enrichment firms:  People Data Labs (PDL), and OxyData.io.  But “implicate” is not the same thing as being able to actually attribute ownership of the elasticsearch server that was open at 35.199.58.125, and both companies denied ownership of the server.

In terms of the quantity and types of data exposed, Troia reports that after deduplication, the PDL user records revealed

roughly 1.2 billion unique people, and 650 million unique email addresses, which is in-line with the statistics provided on their website. The data within the three different PDL indexes also varied slightly, some focusing on scraped LinkedIN information, email addresses and phone numbers, while other indexes provided information on individual social media profiles such as a person’s Facebook, Twitter, and Github URLs.

The OxyData.io data, in contrast, “revealed an almost complete scrape of LinkedIN data, including recruiter information.”
But with neither PDL nor OxyData claiming ownerships (denials that Troia and Diachenko seem to believe based on their research), the public is left with a few questions, at least:

  1.  If the exposed data is not 100% match with PDL and OxyData (and it does not appear to be), then who processed the PDL data to produce the data found on this server?
  2. The data includes data of Canadian, UK, and U.S. citizens.  Does the database violate GDPR? Did whoever is responsible for the data get consent of any EU persons?

As Troia notes, it is often difficult — and in this case impossible — for them to determine ownership.  Google cloud services would know, but they will never tell except under legal process. Google is willing to call a customer and alert them to a security concern, but they will not disclose the name of the customer to whoever reports the leak, and they cannot make the customer do anything.

But maybe a complaint to the ICO would result in more transparency?

 

Category: Exposure

Post navigation

← Lithuanian national, extradited from Ukraine, charged with unauthorized computer intrusion, other crimes
French Hotel Giant Leaks 1TB+ of Client Data →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Nigerian National Sentenced To More Than Five Years For Hacking, Fraud, And Identity Theft Scheme
  • Data breach of patient info ends in firing of Miami hospital employee
  • Texas DOT investigates breach of crash report records, sends notification letters
  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • California county accused of using drones to spy on residents
  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.