DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Mississippi Public School Districts May Not Be Ready to Comply with New Statewide Cybersecurity Requirements

Posted on February 6, 2020 by Dissent

Adam V. Griffin and James A. Keith of Adams and Reese LLP explain:

The Mississippi Department of Education (MDE) is seeking public comment on a proposed rule pertaining to cybersecurity that will require Mississippi public school districts to take substantial actions to prepare. The rule would require each district to:

  • Implement 22 enumerated policies related to the privacy and security of data
  • Give written notification to MDE of any cyber incident or violation of state or federal security or privacy laws and regulations within 24 hours of the district becoming aware of the incident, breach, or violation
  • Cooperate with MDE in investigating incidents, including sharing with MDE any post-incident reports

The Proposed Rule

MDE recently posted the APA notice below:

Administrative Procedures Act (APA) Notice

Office of Technology and Strategic Services Mississippi Seeks Public Comment on State Board Policy Chapter 55, Rule 55.1, Office of Technology and Strategic Services

On January 16, 2020, the State Board of Education (SBE) granted approval to begin the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) process to revise the following Policy:

§  Miss. Admin. Code 7-3:55.1, State Board Policy Chapter 55, Rule 55.1

The proposed revision will provide guidance to the MDE regarding its operational responsibilities as it relates to Data Governance, Security, and Privacy, and the role of the Office of Technology and Strategic Services (OTSS) in meeting those operational responsibilities. The proposed revision will further provide guidance to OTSS regarding its role is supporting Local Educational Agencies as they address their local Data Governance, Security, and Privacy responsibilities. Please submit written comments to John Kraman, Chief Information Officer, Office of Technology and Strategic Services, via email at [email protected] or postal mail to 359 North West Street, Post Office Box 771, Jackson, MS 39205-0771, on or before 5:00 p.m., on February 19, 2020.

The proposed rule includes requirements on the MDE Office of Technology and Strategic Services (OTSS), none of which appear to directly impact school districts (see sections 1–8). However, section 9 is addressed specifically at public school districts, and imposes three new requirements on them. Each is discussed further below.

Creation of Policies, Standards and Procedures

The proposed rule requires districts to create numerous policies, standards and procedures, such as:

  • Access, Account Management, and Password Policy
  • Annual State of Security, Privacy and Data Governance Report for the State Superintendent of Public Education
  • Best Practices Guidelines
  • Data Classification Framework
  • Data Collection, Quality and Matching Standards and Procedures
  • Data Destruction Policy
  • Data Dictionary and Standards
  • Data Sharing and Public Request Procedure
  • Disaster Recovery and Continuity Policy
  • Email and Electronic Communications Policy
  • Incident Response Policy
  • Information Technology Security Policy
  • LEA Security and Privacy Notification Procedures
  • Mandatory Annual Training Program, including Security Awareness and FERPA Training
  • Safe, Appropriate, and Acceptable Use Policy
  • Security and Privacy Processes and Procedures
  • Security and Privacy Violation Reporting Procedure
  • Security Assessment and Compliance Policy
  • Separation of Duties Standards
  • Student and Parent’s Rights
  • Systems Capacity Planning Policy
  • Vendor and Third-Party Control Policy

Most districts do not have policies in place covering all such issues. Notably, the proposed rule provides no time period for implementation, so districts should consider having policies prepared now in anticipation of complying with these obligations.

Read more of their analysis and commentary Lexology.


Related:

  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • John Bolton Indictment Provides Interesting Details About Hack of His AOL Account and Extortion Attempt
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
  • Scenes from a "No Kings" Protest, 10-18-25
  • No Kings. Not Today. Not Ever.
  • An arrested man's lawyer claims his client can't be ShinyHunters' leader. His argument wasn't persuasive.
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesState/Local

Post navigation

← Educational Enrichment Systems, Inc. – Notice Of Data Breach
Maryland Court Finds Coverage for Lost Data and Slow Computers After Ransomware Attack →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.