DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Heartland revises results for third quarter due to breach costs

Posted on November 10, 2009 by Dissent

Breach costs force a revision in estimates. From their press release:

…. subsequent to the release of its earnings for the third quarter on November 3, 2009, Heartland engaged in settlement discussions that resulted in an increase in settlement offers made to certain claimants in an attempt to resolve certain of the claims asserted against Heartland relating to the criminal breach of Heartland’s payment systems environment (the “Processing System Intrusion”). Heartland believes that SFAS No.5, “Accounting for Contingencies” (ASC 450-20) requires it to increase its Reserve for Processing System Intrusion from the amount included in the financial results reported in Heartland’s November 3, 2009 earnings release to reflect this increase in such settlement offers. As a result of the increase in this reserve, Heartland reported in its Form 10-Q, which was filed with the SEC yesterday, a GAAP net loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of $37.1 million, or $0.99 per share, and a GAAP net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of $42.2 million, or $1.12 per share. Results for the quarter are after $73.3 million (pre-tax), or $1.22 per share, of various expenses, accruals and reserves, all of which are attributable to the Processing System Intrusion, including charges related to settlement offers made by Heartland in attempts to resolve certain Processing System Intrusion related claims and expected costs of settling certain other claims as to which settlement discussions between Heartland and the claimants are underway. Such expenses, accruals and reserves for the nine month period totaled $105.3 million (pre-tax) or $1.74 per share. The increase in the Reserve for Processing System Intrusion has no impact on the Adjusted Net Income and Earnings per Share reported in the November 3, 2009 earnings release.

Now that’s a really costly breach. Or is it a bargain? If the U.S. Attorney’s claims that 130 million records or accounts were involved in the intrusion, then it’s less than $1 per record. All in all, though, I think most would agree that this has been a very costly breach for HPS.


Related:

  • US company with access to biggest telecom firms uncovers breach by nation-state hackers
  • Canada says hacktivists breached water and energy facilities
  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • How a hacking gang held Italy’s political elites to ransom
  • On Reports of an Alleged Data Breach Involving G-Xchange, Inc. (GCash)
  • UN Cybercrime Convention to be signed in Hanoi to tackle global offences
Category: Breach IncidentsFinancial SectorHackOf Note

Post navigation

← Queensland Police email private details of traffic offenders
Two plead guilty in WaMu skimming operation →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • CrowdStrike catches insider feeding information to ScatteredLapsus$Hunters
  • Two suspected Scattered Spider hackers plead not guilty over Transport for London cyberattack
  • Attleboro investigating ‘cybersecurity incident’ impacting city’s IT systems
  • Fired techie admits sabotaging ex-employer, causing $862K in damage
  • Threat actors have reportedly launched yet another campaign involving an application connected to Salesforce
  • Russian hackers target IVF clinics across UK used by thousands of couples
  • US, allies sanction Russian bulletproof hosting services for ransomware support
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches
  • Report released on PowerSchool cyber attack

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Cole v. Quest Diagnostics: The Third Circuit Weighs in on Pixels, Privacy, and Medical Data
  • Closing the Privacy Gap: HIPRA Targets Health Apps and Wearables
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data
  • India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.