DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

HIMSS Survey: Business Associates not up to speed on HITECH

Posted on November 17, 2009 by Dissent

Today, HIMSS released a new report, 2009 HIMSS Analytics Report: Evaluating HITECH’s Impact on Healthcare Privacy and Security.

Commissioned by ID Experts, HIMSS surveyed senior information technology (IT) executives, Chief Security Officers, Chief Medical Information Officers (CMIOs), Chief Information Security Officers and Chief Privacy Officers at hospitals throughout the United States.They also surveyed business associates about the impact of the HITECH Act, data breach and patient exposure, and what healthcare organizations are doing. A total of 150 respondents from a provider organization and 26 individuals from an organization that has a business associate relationship with provider organizations participated in this research, which was conducted in August and September of 2009. Approximately half of survey respondents work for organizations with fewer than 100 beds. Slightly less than a third work for organizations with between 100 and 299 beds. The final 14% of respondents work for a hospital with 300 or more beds.

Among the key findings:

  • “Business associates” pose the largest threat to patient data security, putting patients and privacy at risk. Business associates include those who have access to patient data and include pharmacy chains, benefits administrators, claims adjusters, firms who handle mailings to patients, and insurance companies, among others. Somewhat amazingly, over 30% of business associates surveyed did not know the HIPAA privacy and security requirements have been extended to cover their organizations.
  • Given that organizations will now be under increased mandate to disclose and notify individuals of breaches (although the interim rule introduced a “harm” standard not in the actual legislation), hospitals should be looking at the security and privacy practices of their business associates. The survey found that 85% of hospitals indicated they will take action to protect their patient data that is held by a business associate, while a full 39% of business associates admitted they did not know what actions hospitals are taking. In addition, business associates were unaware that 47% of hospitals would terminate their contracts for violations.
  • Somewhat surprisingly, non-IT respondents were more aware of data breaches than IT respondents. The survey found that non-IT respondents reported that their organization had experienced twice as many data breaches as IT respondents (41% vs. 22%).
  • While hospitals are widely providing training for their employees, they are not always monitoring that employees are complying with the organization’s policies and procedures on which they were trained. Nearly all respondents reported that they perform employee privacy and security training to protect against data breach risk. However, less than three-quarters of respondents at hospitals that conducted a risk assessment indicated that information on employee compliance is part of the risk assessment.

Read the press release here. Visit http://www.idexpertscorp.com/breach/download/?altid=b_himms_download&cid=prhimss1117 for a free copy of the HIMSS Analytics study.

Cross-posted from PHIprivacy.net

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHealth DataU.S.

Post navigation

← Starbucks Data Breach Plaintiffs Try Their Luck in the Ninth Circuit
UK mobile phone data ‘was sold’ (Update 1) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Nigerian National Sentenced To More Than Five Years For Hacking, Fraud, And Identity Theft Scheme
  • Data breach of patient info ends in firing of Miami hospital employee
  • Texas DOT investigates breach of crash report records, sends notification letters
  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • California county accused of using drones to spy on residents
  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.