DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

CareSouth Carolina hit with proposed class action lawsuit

Posted on February 2, 2022 by Dissent

ClassActions.org reports that CareSouth Carolina has been hit with a potential class action lawsuit. The caption is Mixon v. CareSouth Carolina, Inc. § 4:22-CV-00269

You can access a copy of the complaint at https://www.classaction.org/media/mixon-v-caresouth-carolina-inc.pdf

The lawsuit stems from what the complaint describes as an attack against CareSouth in 2020 that was first reported to affected individuals in May, 2021.

As DataBreaches.net had found at the time, the breach was reported in May, 2021 to HHS as affecting 76,035 members. Digging into the matter revealed that CareSouth Carolina was just one of Netgain Technology’s clients who had been impacted by a ransomware attack on the IT company in 2020. In its notification to patients, CareSouth claimed that it did not obtain information from Netgain as to who was impacted until April 13, 2021:

On December 1, 2020, Netgain informed CareSouth Carolina that it was investigating an IT security incident. At that time, CareSouth Carolina had no reason to believe that patient information was involved. On January 14, 2021, Netgain informed CareSouth Carolina that its investigation found that some of servers that it maintained for CareSouth Carolina were affected as part of a ransomware attack on December 3, 2020. On April 13, 2021, CareSouth Carolina received a copy of the records that Netgain believed were affected by the attack. On April 27, 2021, CareSouth Carolina completed its review of the records and determined that your information was involved.

As noted in the lawsuit complaint, Netgain paid the unnamed attackers ransom to secure a promise that all data would be deleted, but such promises cannot really be relied upon.

The plaintiff, a Darlington County, South Carolina resident, claims her information was used by “nefarious actors” to open accounts in her name, which thus damaged her reputation and creditworthiness.

“None of the above responses by Defendant or NetGain are adequate to make the Plaintiff whole,” the suit reads.

Can CareSouth be successfully sued for a data security breach at their business associate?   Netgain is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit.

Can the named plaintiff even demonstrate that the identity theft or financial harm she suffered stemmed from this incident and not some other incident? Surely if the threat actors were misusing data from more than 76,000 patients, there would be others all reporting problems at around the same time, no?  And would there be any other clients of Netgain whose patients became victims of fraud or misuse of their data?

When there are so many breaches everywhere, how do you prove that one specific breach was the source of misused data if there are no tagged or mistyped records that can be definitively linked to only that source?

 


Related:

  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Gatineau gymnastics centre warns members of possible data breach
  • Data breach in 42 Latvian municipalities: DVI imposes 300,000 euro fine on ZZ Dats
  • Confidence in ransomware recovery is high but actual success rates remain low
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
Category: Breach IncidentsMalwareSubcontractor

Post navigation

← Your morning reminder that health data breaches are … everywhere (updated)
1 in 7 Ransomware Extortion Attacks Leak Critical Operational Technology Info — Mandiant →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.