DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Ceridian breach disclosure provides clear timeline

Posted on February 7, 2010 by Dissent

Ceridian’s notification to the New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office is now available online (pdf). By letter from its attorney dated February 1, it summarizes the time line beginning with it first becoming aware on December 23 of a possible breach when its personnel spotted unusual activity that might indicate a problem. Further investigation indicated unauthorized access had occurred on December 22 and December 23 and the FBI was subsequently contacted.

By January 11, the company had determined “with reasonable certainty” which files might have been illegally accessed or acquired, and began compiling information on names and addresses of individuals to be notified. By January 29, the company had started sending out notifications.

Although the disclosure does not make any mention of how the hackers were able to gain access to its database (nor is such disclosure required under the law), Ceridian’s disclosure provides a useful example of disclosure and notification letters that are clearly written and generally answer the questions that most recipients might be asking. The company also set up a call center to answer questions and offered those affected free services.

Did they, as one person alleged, contribute to their own problems by having no longer active accounts on the system? Was their security up to industry standards at the time of the incident? I don’t know the answer to either question, but they do get a thumbs up from this site for their quick recognition of a problem, their prompt handling of it, and the clarity of their disclosure and notification letters.

Update: 8-9-10: Their notification to Maryland indicates that 514 Maryland residents were among those affected.


Related:

  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Toys “R” Us Canada customers notified of breach of personal information
  • Kaufman County's data breach was their second one in three weeks
  • Hacking Formula 1: Accessing Max Verstappen's passport and PII through FIA bugs
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
Category: Financial SectorHackU.S.

Post navigation

← Curian Capital slip-up reveals client data to another financial professional
Stolen Abbott Medical Optic backup tapes put employees and consumers at risk →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Two suspected Scattered Spider hackers plead not guilty over Transport for London cyberattack
  • Attleboro investigating ‘cybersecurity incident’ impacting city’s IT systems
  • Fired techie admits sabotaging ex-employer, causing $862K in damage
  • Threat actors have reportedly launched yet another campaign involving an application connected to Salesforce
  • Russian hackers target IVF clinics across UK used by thousands of couples
  • US, allies sanction Russian bulletproof hosting services for ransomware support
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches
  • Report released on PowerSchool cyber attack
  • Sue The Hackers – Google Sues Over Phishing as a Service

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Cole v. Quest Diagnostics: The Third Circuit Weighs in on Pixels, Privacy, and Medical Data
  • Closing the Privacy Gap: HIPRA Targets Health Apps and Wearables
  • Researchers claim ‘largest leak ever’ after uncovering WhatsApp enumeration flaw
  • CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data
  • India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.