DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Updates on three class action lawsuits involving patient data

Posted on September 29, 2022 by Dissent

Magellan Health

Magellan Health agreed to pay $1.43 million to resolve data breach claims stemming from a 2019 phishing attack that exposed data for thousands of patients.

The settlement benefits individuals who received a notification that their personal identifying information or personal health information may have been compromised in the 2019 Magellan Health data breach. This definition includes around 273,000 patients.

The case is Dearing v. Magellan Health Inc. et al., Case No. CV2020-013648, in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Maricopa. The settlement website is MHDataSettlement.com.

Read more at Top Class Actions.

Bansley & Kiener

Accounting firm Bansley & Kiener agreed to pay $900,000 to resolve claims it mismanaged a 2020 data breach by waiting a year to inform authorities.

The settlement benefits individuals who received a notification from Bansley & Kiener informing them their information may have been compromised in the 2020 data breach.

Bansley & Keiner is a CPA and advisory firm based in Chicago. In December 2021, the firm announced it experienced a data breach a year earlier, in December 2020.

The case is Nelson v. Bansley & Kiener, L.L.P., Case No. 2021CH06274, in the Circuit Court First Judicial Circuit Cook County, Illinois. The settlement website is B-KDataSettlement.com.

Read more at Top Class Actions. DataBreaches had previously noted this incident and lawsuit because of the significance of suing for late notification.

East Tennessee Children’s Hospital

Hannah Moore reports that a lawsuit originally filed on June 1 following a cybersecurity data breach at the hospital. It alleged that the breach in March lead to the personal information of more than 400,000 patients being exposed. On July 20, the plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, dropping the suit.

DataBreaches would love to know why there was a voluntary dismissal, but the WATE reporters do not seem to have provided case information as to which lawsuit this was and in which court.

 


Related:

  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
Category: Breach IncidentsHealth DataU.S.

Post navigation

← Honolulu Man Pleads Guilty to Sabotaging Former Employer’s Computer Network
Hong Kong, Aoyuan Healthy Life Group hit by PT_Moisha ransomware group →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.