DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

[CORRECTED] More on the Coleman campaign donor breach

Posted on March 12, 2009 by Dissent

The Minnesota Independent, which has been all over this breach since back in January, has a report from Chris Steller today which quotes the campaign web site privacy policy as it was in effect in January 2008 and as it is now. According to the news story, the site’s stated privacy policy in January read, in part, “We do not retain records of contributors’ credit card numbers.”

As Wikileaks.org points out on their site, retaining the security codes may have violated Minnesota law H.F. 1758. But apart from that issue, there is now the additional issue of potentially violating a stated privacy policy. So when did the campaign start retaining credit card numbers and when did they change their privacy policy? The date created field in the donors list indicates that the first donor’s entry was created on March 19, 2008 and that the last one was created January 6, 2009.


Related:

  • More on the Coleman campaign breach (updated)
  • Coleman campaign donors warned about possible breach
  • Former bank employee indicted on identity theft charges
  • LPL Financial reports theft of computers
  • WikiLeaks breach exposes unredacted US cables; organization blames Guardian reporter
Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← Army database may have been breached
Chicago Fire Department contractor’s laptop stolen (updated) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Telus Digital confirms breach after ShinyHunters claims 1 petabyte data theft
  • China’s CERT warns OpenClaw can inflict nasty wounds
  • Bell Ambulance data breach impacted over 238,000 people
  • Lotte Card fined 9.6 billion won for leaking users’ social registration numbers
  • Handala claims responsibility for attack on medical device maker Stryker
  • Police Scotland fined £66k for extracting and sharing mobile phone data
  • The rise of teen hackers ‘makes for a good headline’, but cyber crime activities peak later in life
  • Viral ‘Quittr’ Porn Addiction App Exposed the Masturbation Habits of Hundreds of Thousands of Users
  • New Report Finds One in Two U.S. School Districts Experienced a Cybersecurity Incident in 2025
  • Foreign hacker in 2023 compromised Epstein files held by FBI, source and documents show

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Privacy watchdogs sound alarm over US bid to get travellers’ social media
  • Petition filed over misuse of protesters’ data by Kenyan government and telcos
  • When Miscarriage Is Recast As Murder
  • The Government Uses Targeted Advertising to Track Your Location. Here’s What We Need to Do.
  • Santa Ana homeowner says insurance company used drone to inspect her roof without telling her

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: Dissent.73

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.