DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Driver's Ed Photos of Dead Youth Didn't Violate Family's Privacy

Posted on December 17, 2009 by Dissent

Jeff Gorman reports:

A woman can’t collect damages from a paramedic who displayed photos of her son’s dead body in a driver’s education class, the Tennessee Court of Appeals ruled.

Jeremy Wooten died in a car accident at the age of 21. Paramedic Don Horton kept the photos, which are typically taken at the scene of serious accidents, in an album.

Horton spoke at a driver’s education class three months later at the high school Jeremy had attended. One student recognized Jeremy and became upset. She took the photos of Jeremy out of the album and ran out of class.

The student gave the photos to Jeremy’s best friend. He passed them along to Jeremy’s family, who sued Horton and Robertson County for invasion of privacy, infliction of emotional distress and mishandling of human remains.

The trial court dismissed the emotional distress charge, because the family members were not in the driver’s education class. The court ruled for the defendants on all other charges.

On appeal, Judge Holly Kirby ruled that the photograph display did not constitute a mishandling of human remains or an invasion of privacy.

“As the trial court observed, the photos were taken in a public place. We must respectfully conclude that, under these circumstances, a display of these photos cannot be deemed an ‘intrusion’ into the plaintiffs’ ‘seclusion’ or into their private affairs,” Kirby wrote.

You can read the court opinion here.

Frankly, I was surprised when I read the story, so I read the ruling to see how the judge reasoned. While reading the ruling helps, I still find myself offended by the outcome.

And even if it isn’t a violation of state law, isn’t this a HIPAA violation as the paramedic was in his professional capacity when he took the picture? Can some HIPAA expert explain this to me?

No related posts.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Hacker hits NC community college system
Heartland pays Amex $3.6M over 2008 data breach →

2 thoughts on “Driver's Ed Photos of Dead Youth Didn't Violate Family's Privacy”

  1. Anonymous says:
    December 20, 2009 at 1:08 am

    This is pretty straightforward, this lawsuit clearly had no merit whatsoever.

    Generally when you are outdoors in a public area (such as in a street) you have absolutely no expectation of privacy whatsoever. You can be filmed or photographed without permission. HIPAA doesnt even come into play, a random bystander could have also legally photographed the scene.

  2. Anonymous says:
    December 20, 2009 at 9:47 am

    If a medic renders services to an accident victim while in their capacity as part of a HIPAA-covered entity, then even if the accident was in a public space, the medic cannot discuss the services rendered as that would be a HIPAA violation, right? How is taking a photo and then displaying it not exposing information obtained while in the capacity of a HIPAA-covered entity? What the public can do is one thing, but HIPAA-covered entities are held to a different/higher standard, I thought.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Texas Centers for Infectious Disease Associates Notifies Individuals of Data Breach in 2024
  • Battlefords Union Hospitals notifies patients of employee snooping in their records
  • Alert: Scattered Spider has added North American airline and transportation organizations to their target list
  • Northern Light Health patients affected by security incident at Compumedics; 10 healthcare entities affected
  • Privacy commissioner reviewing reported Ontario Health atHome data breach
  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data
  • Sacred Secrets: The Biblical Case for Privacy and Data Protection
  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.