DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Walgreens still under investigation by OCR

Posted on August 7, 2010 by Dissent

Dom Nicastro of HealthLeaders Media reports:

The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) confirmed this week its investigation into the nation’s largest drugstore chain, Walgreens, based on the same television media reports that led to million-dollar settlements with CVS and Rite Aid for potential HIPAA violations.

The investigation stems from a 2006 series of articles by WTHR in Indiana. Earlier coverage of the case can be found in the archives of PogoWasRight.org and on this site by searching for CVS, Walgreens, and RiteAid.

I’m not sure why this confirmation is really “news,” however, as we had a statement from the Indiana Attorney General’s Office over a year ago that indicated that OCR was investigating Walgreens. It seems most likely that both the FTC and OCR have teamed up on this investigation as they did with CVS and RiteAid and that eventually we may see statements from both agencies.

If Walgreens gets fined, that would make it a trifecta, as the second and third largest pharmacy chains (CVS and RiteAid) have already been fined for similar charges of improper disposal of protected health information.

In July 2009, Walgreens settled with the Indiana Attorney General’s Office over the state’s charges of improper disposal of PHI. The state’s charges were triggered by the same media reports that presumably have resulted in this federal investigation.

The state’s settlement of charges that had been filed in 2007 required Walgreens to agree to implement extensive employee training, management policies and detailed reporting to provide greater safeguards so that customers’ personal information would not be improperly disclosed. Under the agreement, Walgreens paid $6,000.00 to cover the cost of the state’s investigation. To date, however, Walgreens has escaped the kind of significant penalties CVS and RiteAid were given by the federal government.

At the time of the Indiana settlement, Walgreens issued the following statement:

“We are glad to reach this agreement and believe we have always followed HIPAA standards. We have sound practices and policies that protect our patients’ information, and we will continue to adhere to them.”

Not a very impressive statement after the media exposed all the improper disposal, and I guess the federal government was as unconvinced that I was that Walgreens has always followed HIPAA standards.

But does it really take years to investigate these complaints? Wouldn’t actions and penalties by the FTC and OCR be somewhat more effective if they were more timely and might serve as a deterrent to others?

Related posts:

  • California judge orders Walgreens to pay $16.57M to settle charges of improper disposal of environmental waste and records with consumers' confidential medical information
  • CVS, Walgreens settle with Indiana AG
  • CVS, Walgreens settle with Indiana AG
  • RiteAid mobile app left customer prescription history vulnerable – customer
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Oakwood Hospital Employee Fired for Facebook Posting
TX: Hundreds report stolen card info →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Texas Centers for Infectious Disease Associates Notifies Individuals of Data Breach in 2024
  • Battlefords Union Hospitals notifies patients of employee snooping in their records
  • Alert: Scattered Spider has added North American airline and transportation organizations to their target list
  • Northern Light Health patients affected by security incident at Compumedics; 10 healthcare entities affected
  • Privacy commissioner reviewing reported Ontario Health atHome data breach
  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems
  • 222,000 customer records allegedly from Manhattan Parking Group leaked

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data
  • Sacred Secrets: The Biblical Case for Privacy and Data Protection
  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach
  • Nestle USA Settles Suit Over Job-Application Medical Questions

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.