DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Walgreens still under investigation by OCR

Posted on August 7, 2010 by Dissent

Dom Nicastro of HealthLeaders Media reports:

The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) confirmed this week its investigation into the nation’s largest drugstore chain, Walgreens, based on the same television media reports that led to million-dollar settlements with CVS and Rite Aid for potential HIPAA violations.

The investigation stems from a 2006 series of articles by WTHR in Indiana. Earlier coverage of the case can be found in the archives of PogoWasRight.org and on this site by searching for CVS, Walgreens, and RiteAid.

I’m not sure why this confirmation is really “news,” however, as we had a statement from the Indiana Attorney General’s Office over a year ago that indicated that OCR was investigating Walgreens. It seems most likely that both the FTC and OCR have teamed up on this investigation as they did with CVS and RiteAid and that eventually we may see statements from both agencies.

If Walgreens gets fined, that would make it a trifecta, as the second and third largest pharmacy chains (CVS and RiteAid) have already been fined for similar charges of improper disposal of protected health information.

In July 2009, Walgreens settled with the Indiana Attorney General’s Office over the state’s charges of improper disposal of PHI. The state’s charges were triggered by the same media reports that presumably have resulted in this federal investigation.

The state’s settlement of charges that had been filed in 2007 required Walgreens to agree to implement extensive employee training, management policies and detailed reporting to provide greater safeguards so that customers’ personal information would not be improperly disclosed. Under the agreement, Walgreens paid $6,000.00 to cover the cost of the state’s investigation. To date, however, Walgreens has escaped the kind of significant penalties CVS and RiteAid were given by the federal government.

At the time of the Indiana settlement, Walgreens issued the following statement:

“We are glad to reach this agreement and believe we have always followed HIPAA standards. We have sound practices and policies that protect our patients’ information, and we will continue to adhere to them.”

Not a very impressive statement after the media exposed all the improper disposal, and I guess the federal government was as unconvinced that I was that Walgreens has always followed HIPAA standards.

But does it really take years to investigate these complaints? Wouldn’t actions and penalties by the FTC and OCR be somewhat more effective if they were more timely and might serve as a deterrent to others?

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Oakwood Hospital Employee Fired for Facebook Posting
TX: Hundreds report stolen card info →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • AT&T gets preliminary approval for $177 million data breach settlement
  • Aflac notifies SEC of breach suspected to be work of Scattered Spider
  • Former JBLM soldier pleads guilty to attempting to share military secrets with China
  • No, the 16 billion credentials leak is not a new data breach — a wake-up call about fake news
  • Tonga’s health system hit by cyberattack (1)
  • Russia Expert Falls Prey to Elite Hackers Disguised as US Officials
  • Proposed class action settlement in In re Netgain Technology litigation
  • Qilin Offers “Call a lawyer” Button For Affiliates Attempting To Extort Ransoms From Victims Who Won’t Pay
  • Ireland’s Data Protection Commission publishes 2024 Annual Report
  • The headlines suggested Freedman Healthcare suffered a ransomware attack that affected patient data. The reality was quite different.

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data
  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.