DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Connecticut Insurance Commissioner Announces Data Breach Notification Mandate

Posted on August 27, 2010 by Dissent

Joseph Lazzarotti of Jackson Lewis writes:

On August 18, 2010, the Connecticut Insurance Commissioner issued Bulletin IC-25 which mandates that entities within its jurisdiction notify the Department of Insurance of any “information security incident.” This post provides a brief summary of this new requirement.

[…]

What is an “information security incident”?

Under this Bulletin, an information security incident is:

any unauthorized acquisition or transfer of, or access to, personal health, financial, or personal information, whether or not encrypted, of a Connecticut insured, member, subscriber, policyholder or provider, in whatever form the information is collected, used or stored, which is obtained or maintained by a licensee or registrant of the Insurance Department, the loss of which could compromise or put at risk the personal, financial, or physical well being of the affected insureds, members, subscribers, policyholders or providers.

Thus, unlike the general Connecticut data breach notification statute which requires notification only with respect to computerized personal information, this mandate applies to paper documents which includes personal health, financial or personal information. Also, encrypted data is not exempt from this notification requirement.

Read more about the new bulletin on  Workplace Privacy Data Management & Security Report.  The state is now requiring covered entities to provide them with a lot of detailed information to the state within five (5) calendar days after a breach is identified.

Obviously, I’m delighted to  see the inclusion of paper records and the absence of a “significant harm” threshold.    Without knowing the history of this bulletin,  I might guess that it is,  at least in part, a reaction to a number of breaches by health insurers where neither the state nor residents were promptly notified of a breach and where the state’s attorney general investigated the breaches and insisted that the insurers offer credit monitoring services, etc.

That said, this situation also highlights the patchwork quality of regulations and statutes even with one state, much less between states.    Can you hear me now, Congress?


Related:

  • The day after XSS.is forum was seized, it struggles to come back online -- but is it really them?
  • Korea imposes 343 million won penalty on HAESUNG DS for data breach of 70,000 shareholders
  • Paying cyberattackers is wrong, right? Should Taos County's incident be an exception? (1)
  • IVF provider Genea notifies patients about the cyberattack earlier this year.
  • Key figure behind major Russian-speaking cybercrime forum targeted in Ukraine
  • Legal Silence and Chilling Effects: Injunctions Against the Press in Cybersecurity
Category: Breach LawsCommentaries and AnalysesOf Note

Post navigation

← The Rite Aid Scandal: Health Records Still Treated as Commodities
Info privacy still lags in India: Deloitte →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Connex Credit Union notifies 172,000 members of hacking incident
  • Federal judiciary says it is boosting security after cyberattack; researcher finds new leaks (CORRECTED)
  • Bank of America Refused To Reimburse Georgia Customer After Hackers Hit Account. Then a News Station Showed Up.
  • NCERT Issues Advisory on “Blue Locker” Ransomware Targeting Pakistan’s Key Institutions
  • Scattered Spider has a new Telegram channel to list its attacks
  • SC: Spartanburg County hit by cyberattack, some online services disrupted
  • Pakistan Petroleum thwarts ransomware attempt, says no critical data compromised
  • ShinyHunters sent Google an extortion demand; Shiny comments on current activities
  • Air France and KLM alert customers to data breach on external platform
  • Samourai CEO Keonne Rodriguez and Samourai CTO William Lonergan Hill Pled Guilty to Operating a Money Transmitting Business, Samourai Wallet, That Transmitted Over $200 Million in Criminal Proceeds

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Germany’s top court holds that police can only use spyware to investigate serious crimes
  • Flightradar24 receives reprimand for violating aircraft data privacy rights
  • Nebraska Attorney General Sues GM and OnStar Over Alleged Privacy Violations
  • Federal Court Allows Privacy Related Claims to Proceed in a Proposed Class Action Lawsuit Against Motorola
  • Italian Garante Adopts Statement on Health Data and AI
  • Trump administration is launching a new private health tracking system with Big Tech’s help
  • Attorney General James Takes Action to Protect Sensitive Personal Information of Tens of Millions of People

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.