DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Ca: Patient names to stay private

Posted on December 4, 2010 by Dissent

Pamela Cowan reports:

Protecting the privacy of patients trumps raising donor dollars for the province’s hospital foundations — at least for now.

This spring, the provincial government amended health privacy regulations so health regions could share with their local hospital foundation the names and addresses of people who’d received hospital services.

The policy set out a 60-day waiting period before health foundations could send a letter soliciting donations and no information about a patient’s diagnosis was provided. In addition, there was a provision for patients to opt out if they didn’t want their personal information given to a health foundation.

However, some residents in the Regina Qu’Appelle Health Region voiced their opposition to the amendment.

“We have decided that we won’t be releasing patient information to fundraising bodies,” said Dwight Nelson, CEO of the RQHR. “There was the sense that the public, in general, didn’t like the idea of having to explicitly opt out or otherwise they’d be contacted … Our board members certainly heard from some members of the public and, in general, people weren’t very enthused about having their information released.”

Read more in the Regina Leader-Post.

I think this is the right decision. Let people opt-in or find some other way. And I wish U.S. regulations were also more protective of patients’ names and contact info when it comes to acceptable use of such information.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Is “Data Mining” of Prescription and Patient Records Protected By the First Amendment?
Wikileaks Cablegate: Time to Blame the Victim? →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Dutch police identify users on Cracked.io
  • Help, please: Seeking copies of the PowerSchool ransom email(s)
  • RCMP thumb drive with informant, witness data obtained by criminals: watchdog
  • Evoke Wellness to Pay $1.9 Million to Settle FTC Claims That They Misled Consumers Seeking Substance Use Disorder Treatment
  • Former Hilliard treatment center employee accused of selling patient data on dark web
  • Trump Rewrites Cybersecurity Policy in Executive Order
  • AMI Group – Travel & Tours notice of ransomware attack
  • Resource: Insider Threat reports
  • Za: Cyber extortionist sentenced to eight years in jail
  • ICE takes steps to deport the Australian hacker known as “DR32”

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Republicans Move A Step Closer To Repealing Protections For Abortion Clinics
  • Democrats introduce bill that aims to protect reproductive health data
  • Don’t Mind If I Do: Montana Says Hands Off Neural Data
  • 23andMe leadership grilled by lawmakers demanding answers about data security amid bankruptcy sale
  • Privacy Victory! Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in OPM/DOGE Lawsuit
  • The Decision That Murdered Privacy
  • Hearing on the Federal Government and AI

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report