DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

MA: Spectrum says personal, health care info stolen

Posted on October 17, 2011 by Dissent

A local health systems company said a stolen hard drive contains personal and protected health information of some of its clients.

According to a statement from Spectrum, no financial information was on the hard drive, and the data was double password protected. However, it was not encrypted because it was being used temporarily, and patient information included names, mailing addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, diagnostic codes and medical insurance numbers.

According to Spectrum, the theft of three electronic devices from the Spectrum offices at 484 Main St. in Worcester occurred Aug. 24, but only one of the devices contained the personal and protected health information.

Read more on Worcester Telegram.

A notice dated October 13 on Spectrum’s web site begins:

Dear Spectrum Client:

We are writing to inform you about important information concerning a recent data security breach affecting your personal and protected health information, which Spectrum Health Systems, Inc. (“Spectrum”) discovered on August 30, 2011.

Incident

On August 24, 2011, a theft occurred at one of Spectrum’s offices in Worcester. Spectrum learned about the theft the following day and discovered that a desktop computer and a laptop computer were stolen. No personal information was contained on either the stolen desktop computer or laptop. Spectrum promptly notified the Worcester Police Department (WPD), which began an investigation. Upon further internal investigation, Spectrum learned, on or around August 30, 2011, that a non-portable computer hard drive containing personal information had also been stolen during the August 24 theft. Following discovery of the missing hard drive, Spectrum again promptly notified the WPD, including the fact that personal information was contained on it.

Based upon Spectrum’s investigation to date, the stolen hard drive could contain personal and protected health information of individuals that have received services at Spectrum programs between 2002 and March 2011 at Spectrum’s inpatient and outpatient programs in Westborough, Worcester, Milford, Framingham, Southbridge, Fitchburg, and Weymouth. The hard drive was double-password-protected but not encrypted. No financial information was contained on the hard drive.

The types of personal and protected health information that were contained on the hard drive included names, mailing addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, diagnostic codes, and medical insurance numbers.

Since the incident took place, Spectrum has taken several measures to upgrade the physical security of the facility. Spectrum has also completed reviewing whether all portable and non-portable electronic devices containing personal information are encrypted consistent with its written information security plan.

[…]

It’s not clear to me why the newspaper’s coverage says that the drive was not encrypted “because it was being used temporarily,” as that is not in Spectrum’s statement. Nor does the description of the drive suggest that its use was only temporary.

Given that the data were on patients being treated for addiction and mental illness, and that the drive contained diagnostic codes, this breach really involved sensitive data. And of course, apart from the medical sensitivity issues, the drive also contained Social Security numbers. Will Spectrum stop using them now?

Spectrum’s statement does not indicate how many patients were notified of the breach, but I expect additional details to be made available on this. Given Massachusett’s strict laws, it wouldn’t surprise me if the Attorney General’s Office investigated this one.


Related:

  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
  • Heritage Provider Network $49.99M Class Action Settlement
  • Integris Health Agrees to $30 Million Settlement Over 2023 Data Breach
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Medical identity theft a growing problem
Dumfries and Galloway Council gets rap on the knuckles and undertaking for web exposure breach →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.