DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

IE: Investigation into possible data breach at 02

Posted on December 4, 2012 by Dissent

Irish mobile phone carrier O2 may have had a breach involving customer data. Or not. It seems they’re not really sure what was on a missing backup tape.  And I’m not sure I understand why they first told this summer that a tape went missing in September 2011.

And of course I’m not sure I understand why consumers should be less concerned just because a firm thinks that a tape is still on its premises.  If you can’t find something and people had been in and out, how can you be sure it wasn’t stolen?

Update: Brian Honan shares his questions about this breach.


Related:

  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • Hotel and Casino near Las Vegas Strip suffers data breach, documents say
  • Bombay High Court Orders Department of Telecommunications to Block Medusa Accounts After Generali Insurance Data Breach
  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorLost or MissingNon-U.S.Subcontractor

Post navigation

← AU: Macquarie University reportedly hacked
Three more breaches, and ignorance is definitely not bliss →

1 thought on “IE: Investigation into possible data breach at 02”

  1. Andy Ush says:
    December 6, 2012 at 9:06 am

    I agree with the sentiments of Brian Honan and also would have liked to see some clear direction from the Data Protection Commissioner.

    The articles refer to “may have”, “believes” and “it is possible”. These phrases do not install confidence that they treat data security seriously. Basically it means they don’t have a clue what has happened and to release a statement 5 months on after identifying the loss indicates they are not likely to find it as they would surely have turned over every stone by now.

    The data on the tape contains a snapshot from O2’s internal company drives stating it “may have” contained customer information. That means they don’t know. If they can’t state that it DOES NOT contain customer data then it should be presumed it does.

    The Commissioner then makes a ridiculous statement stating that as the tape was lost internally customers should not be unduly concerned. This shows they have a complete lack of understanding of the situation as indicated by Brian. If they can’t locate the tape how do they know it is not “in the wild” so to speak.

    O2 indicated that they were not aware of any incident since the loss to indicate the information on the tapes has been used. Having said that they don’t really know what information was not on the tape nor could they have any effective monitoring in place to identify any such occurrence.

    Having had 5 months to prepare for this release I don’t think they have done a particularly good job on it

    From an unhappy current O2 customer.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.