DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Banks Ask 5th Circ. To Revive Heartland Data Breach Claims

Posted on February 12, 2013 by Dissent

Megan Stride of Law360 writes that a lawsuit against Heartland Payment Systems over their 2008 breach may not be totally dead:

A group of banks on Friday asked the Fifth Circuit to revive their negligence claims against Heartland Payment Systems Inc. in multidistrict litigation over a 2008 data breach, saying Heartland’s claim that it shared a contractual relationship with the banks shouldn’t defeat their appeal.

In their reply brief, nine credit-card-issuing banks. including Amalgamated Bank and Lone Star National Bank NA, argue that a New Jersey economic loss rule doesn’t bar their negligence claim against Heartland because it only bars claims for foreseeable economic losses when the parties are in a contractual relationship.

The payment card processor argued in its own Jan. 22 brief that it had a contract-based relationship with the banks because all the parties had agreed to be bound by a set of operating regulations that allowed issuers to recover losses resulting from another participant’s security failures. But the financial institutions say they never negotiated or entered into a contract with Heartland.

[…]

The banks are appealing a Texas federal court’s dismissal of their New Jersey law negligence claims against Heartland, which were part of an MDL that also included a litigation track for consumer claims.The case is Lone Star National Bank NA et al. v. Heartland Payment Systems Inc., case number 12-20648, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Read more on Law360 (subscription required).


Related:

  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
  • Before Their Telegram Channel Was Banned Again, ScatteredLAPSUS$Hunters Dropped Files Doxing Government Employees (2)
  • Attorney General James Secures $14.2 Million from Car Insurance Companies Over Data Breaches
Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← Trustwave: Detection of intrusions can sometimes take two years
IE: Doctor guilty of misconduct after patient files dumped near his home →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.