DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Kierkegaard & Perry Labs report hack through a “known bug” in their platform

Posted on September 23, 2013 by Dissent

I think it would be fair to say that Kierkegaard & Perry Labs, Inc’s breach notification to Maryland in July impressed me somewhat unfavorably. KPL was reporting a hack that had compromised some customers’ names, addresses, and credit card numbers with expiration dates and CVV codes. Their investigation revealed that 8 customers’ information was acquired (not just accessed) by the hacker(s), who had been able to insert code into the e-commerce site.

So far, nothing unusual, and I suspect that most of the cards were likely corporate or organizational credit cards and not personal ones, but:

  1. KPL submitted a copy of a customer notification letter  stating how they take privacy and security seriously – but didn’t redact the customer’s name and address;
  2. They offered  affected customers  only 6 mos. of free credit monitoring; and
  3. In their cover letter to the state, they state that their  e-commerce site was hacked from an IP in Romania “through a known bug in the website platform.” After the hack, they patched their software. They do not state whether the patch was available for the “known bug” before the hack.

If you were one of their customers and read their cover letter to the state and notification letter to customers, would you feel confident that they take privacy and security seriously?

Category: Business SectorCommentaries and AnalysesHack

Post navigation

← MO HealthNet/InfoCrossing breach much longer and larger than previously recognized
Alabama state employee sentenced for stealing info from state database for tax refund fraud scheme (updated) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Major trial underway for data leak that left 72,000 victims in France
  • Anubis: A Closer Look at an Emerging Ransomware with Built-in Wiper
  • HealthEC Agrees to $5.48 Million Settlement to End Data Breach Lawsuit
  • US offering $10 million for info on Iranian hackers behind IOControl malware
  • Sompo Japan Insurance submits improvement plan after info leakage
  • Moreno Valley, Calif., Schools Report Data Breach
  • The Growing Cyber Risks from AI — and How Organizations Can Fight Back
  • Credit Control Corporation data allegedly from 9.1 million consumers listed for sale on forum
  • Copilot AI Bug Could Leak Sensitive Data via Email Prompts
  • FTC Provides Guidance on Updated Safeguards Rule

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report